SynthesisMedicine2020
Antidepressant use and colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality: A dose-response meta analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between antidepressant use and gynecological cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Antidepressant Use and Lung Cancer Risk and Survival: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.Cancer research communications · 2023Pooled it
- Psychosomatics at the threshold: cancer, mood disorders, and the mental pain of death - where precision medicine meets spirituality.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Desipramine induces eryptosis in human erythrocytes, an effect blunted by nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside and N-acetyl-L-cysteine but enhanced by Calcium depletion.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The risk of colorectal cancer associated to antidepressant use remains unclear. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the risk of colorectal cancer associated to antidepressant use.Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database were accessed from the dates of their establishment to October 2018, to collect study of antidepressant use and colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality. Then a meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0 software.A total of 11 publications involving 109,506 participants were included. The meta-analysis showed that antidepressant use was not associated with colorectal cancer morbidity (relevant risk (RR): 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-1.01) and mortality (RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.99-1.17). Subgroup analysis showed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.96-1.03) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.86-1.26) were not associated with colorectal cancer risk; however, TCA was associated with colorectal cancer risk decrement (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87-0.98). Furthermore, the results also showed that antidepressant use was not associated with colorectal cancer risk in Europe and North America (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92-1.02) and Asia (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.95-1.26). Additionally, a dose-response showed per 1 year of duration of antidepressant use incremental increase was not associated with colorectal cancer risk (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.87-1.09).Evidence suggests that antidepressant use was not associated with colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality. The cumulative duration of antidepressant use did not utilized played critical roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.