Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32481373›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2020

Regional variation in states' naloxone accessibility laws in association with opioid overdose death rates-Observational study (STROBE compliant).

Hyo-Sun You, Jane Ha, Cyra-Y Kang, Leeseul Kim, Jinah Kim, Jay J Shen, Seong-Min Park, Sung-Youn Chun, Jinwook Hwang, Takashi Yamashita and 7 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hyo-Sun YouDepartment of Family Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Chungbuk.
Jane HaDepartment of Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cyra-Y KangSchool of Medicine.
Leeseul KimSchool of Medicine.
Jinah KimSchool of Medicine.
Jay J ShenDepartment of Health Care Administration and Policy, School of Public Health.
Seong-Min ParkDepartment of Criminal Justice, Greenspun College of Urban Affairs, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Nevada.
Sung-Youn ChunSchool of Medicine.
Jinwook HwangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine.
Takashi YamashitaDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology, and Health Administration and Policy, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.
Se Won LeeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mountain View Hospital.
Georgia DounisSchool of Dental Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Yong-Jae LeeDepartment of Family Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine.
Dong-Hun HanDepartment of Health Care Administration and Policy, School of Public Health.
David ByunDepartment of Medicine, Southern Nevada Veterans Affairs Health System, North Las Vegas, Nevada.
Ji Won YooDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Medicine, 1701 W. Charleston Blvd Ste 230, Las Vegas, NV.ORCID 0000-0001-7196-8682
Hee-Taik KangDepartment of Family Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Chungbuk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though overall death from opioid overdose are increasing in the United States, the death rate in some states and population groups is stabilizing or even decreasing. Several states have enacted a Naloxone Accessibility Laws to increase naloxone availability as an opioid antidote. The extent to which these laws permit layperson distribution and possession varies. The aim of this study is to investigate differences in provisions of Naloxone Accessibility Laws by states mainly in the Northeast and West regions, and the impact of naloxone availability on the rates of drug overdose deaths.This cross-sectional study was based on the National Vital Statistics System multiple cause-of-death mortality files. The average changes in drug overdose death rates between 2013 and 2017 in relevant states of the Northeast and West regions were compared according to availability of naloxone to laypersons.Seven states in the Northeast region and 10 states in the Western region allowed layperson distribution of naloxone. Layperson possession of naloxone was allowed in 3 states each in the Northeast and the Western regions. The average drug overdose death rates increased in many states in the both regions regardless of legalization of layperson naloxone distribution. The average death rates of 3 states that legalized layperson possession in the West region decreased (-0.33 per 100,000 person); however, in states in the West region that did not allow layperson possession and states in the Northeast region regardless of layperson possession increased between 2013 and 2017.The provision to legalize layperson possession of naloxone was associated with decreased average opioid overdose death rates in 3 states of the West region.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCross-Sectional StudiesDrug OverdoseHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsRetrospective StudiesState GovernmentUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID32481373
PMCPMC12245322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.