Observational studyMedicine2020
Expression and clinical significance of serum cystatin C in patients with hypertension and coronary heart disease.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of biomarkers in identifying women at risk of hypertension and renal dysfunction on follow-up after severe preeclampsia.Journal of human hypertension · 2025Article
- Emerging trends in the cystatin C sensing technologies: towards better chronic kidney disease management.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Application effect of task-oriented multi-dimensional nursing intervention in patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease and concurrent hypertension.African health sciences · 2024Article
- Lower serum cystatin C level predicts poor functional outcome in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage independent of renal function.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023Article
- Tengdan Capsule Prevents Hypertensive Kidney Damage in SHR by Inhibiting Periostin-Mediated Renal Fibrosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Intervention Effect of Probiotics in Gastric Cancer Patients with Complications of Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explore the potential association between cystatin C (Cys-c) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in hypertensive patients.In this study, circulating levels of Cys-c in 62 essential hypertension (EH) patients, 147 hypertension with coronary heart disease (EH + CHD) patients, and 60 healthy volunteers were investigated using immunoturbidimetry. Then, we analyzed the correlations between Cys-C and other clinical parameters.Serum Cys-C level was significantly higher in the EH and EH + CHD groups than in the control group, and higher in the EH + CHD group than in the EH group. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed that the diagnostic value of Cys-C for patients with hypertension combined CHD was 0.871(95% CI: 0.818-0.913). Serum Cys-C level was significantly higher in the double-vessel disease group and multi-vessel disease group than in the single-vessel disease group, and higher in the multi-vessel disease group than in the double-vessel disease group. Urinary albumin and CRP correlated positively with Cys-C, and HDL correlated negatively with Cys-C. Cys-C was an independent risk factor for CHD in hypertensive patients.Our results suggested that circulating Cys-C levels was up-regulated in patients with hypertension and CHD, and had correlation with the severity of coronary artery disease. As one of the important risk factors for CHD, Cys-C can predict the occurrence of CHD in patients with hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.