Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32481367›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Patient satisfaction in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A multi-center comparative patient evaluation of prosthesis, LDMF, and TRAM techniques.

Chuqi Lei, Lijie Xu, Feng Xu, Jie Li, Hongchuan Jiang, Shan Guan, Xiang Wang, Bing Wen, Jinfeng Li, Xiru Li and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-Term Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) in Patients with Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chuqi LeiDepartment of Breast Surgery.
Lijie XuDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital.
Feng XuDepartment of Breast Surgery.
Jie LiDepartment of Breast Surgery.
Hongchuan JiangDepartment of Breast Surgery.
Shan GuanDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital.
Xiang WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
Bing WenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The First Hospital of Peking University.
Jinfeng LiDepartment of Breast Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital.
Xiru LiDepartment of General Surgery, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing.
Cuizhi GengBreast Center, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei.
Jian YinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze patient satisfaction and the predictive factors characterizing three types of one-stage immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy, including prosthesis, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF), transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap techniques.Data were collected via face-to-face or telephone interviews from eight breast centers in China from January 2012 to December 2016. A standardized questionnaire that evaluated the general satisfaction and aesthetic satisfaction was sent to patients who had undergone IBR. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with patient satisfaction among the three types of breast reconstruction.A total of 412 questionnaires were sent out, and 309 copies were collected including 226 prosthesis, 46 LDMF, and 37 pedicle TRAM reconstruction. Logistic regression analysis showed that general satisfaction and aesthetic satisfaction were significantly correlated with radiotherapy (P < .001, P = .018), respectively. Besides, the aesthetic satisfaction was also associated with nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation (P < .001).Our multi-center study identified factors of higher patient satisfaction, like NAC preservation and absence of radiotherapy, in order to help breast surgeons make better decisions about individualized reconstruction plan.

Indexed as

MastectomyAdultBreast ImplantsFemaleHumansMammaplastyMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRectus AbdominisSuperficial Back MusclesSurgical Flaps

Identifiers

PMID32481367
PMCPMC12245330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.