Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32481258›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

Barbed suture versus traditional suture in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Pengbiao Li, Wenhui Zhang, Yanyan Wang, Jinlong Li, Peijing Yan, Shifang Guo, Jie Liu, Kehu Yang, Zongru He, Yaowen Qian

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pengbiao LiGansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu.
Wenhui ZhangGansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu.
Yanyan WangGansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu.
Jinlong LiPeople's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan.
Peijing YanInstitute of Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital.
Shifang GuoGansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu.
Jie LiuGansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu.
Kehu YangInstitute of Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital.
Zongru HeGansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu.
Yaowen QianGansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu.
Versus Arthritis · GBGansu Provincial Hospital · CNNingxia Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarbed suture has been widely used in some surgical fields, and it has achieved good results, but the application in total knee arthroplasty is still controversial.

objectiveLiterature is collected for statistical analysis so as to provide evidence for the use of barbed suture in Total knee arthroplasty.

methodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane library and EMBASE database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using barbed suture and conventional suture to close incisions after primary total knee arthroplasty, and the retrieval time was from July 2019 to the establishment of the database. Literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality evaluation and data extraction were conducted for the final included literature, and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.

resultsA total of six RCTs (826 knees) were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that the re-negative conversion could shorten the wound closure time (MD -4.41, 95% CI -5.11 to -3.72, P < .00001) and reduce the wound closure total cost (MD -282.61, 95% CI -445.36 to -119.85, P = .0007) and acupuncture injury (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.78, P = .02), and did not significantly increasing the incidence of complications (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.05-0.96, P = .38) or suture breakages (RR 4.58, 95% CI 0.16-128.29, P = .37). There were no significant differences in ROM at postoperative 6 weeks and 3 months (MD -0.74, 95% CI -4.19 to 2.71, P = .67; MD -0.30, 95% CI -2.62 to 2.02, P = .80) and no significant differences in KSS at postoperative 6 weeks (MD -0.22, 95% CI -3.10 to 2.66, P = .88).

conclusionsOur study shows that barbed suture is a fast, low-cost, safe and effective suture method in total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional suture, we also need more literature and longer follow-up to confirm this conclusion.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuturesArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeEquipment DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID32481258
PMCPMC7249882
OpenAlexW3030098833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.