Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32481234›Full record

ArticleJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2020

Reliability and validity of the mCTSIB dynamic platform test to assess balance in a population of older women living in the community.

Eleftheria Antoniadou, Xristina Kalivioti, Konstantinos Stolakis, Amalia Koloniari, Panagiotis Megas, Minos Tyllianakis, Elias Panagiotopoulos

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Introduction to a Twin Dual-Axis Robotic Platform for Studies of Lower Limb Biomechanics.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eleftheria AntoniadouRehabilitation Clinic, Patras University Hospital, Patras Greece.
Xristina KaliviotiRehabilitation Clinic, Patras University Hospital, Patras Greece.
Konstantinos StolakisRehabilitation Clinic, Patras University Hospital, Patras Greece.
Amalia KoloniariRehabilitation Clinic, Patras University Hospital, Patras Greece.
Panagiotis MegasOrthopedic Department, Patras University Hospital, Patras Greece.
Minos TyllianakisOrthopedic Department, Patras University Hospital, Patras Greece.
Elias PanagiotopoulosRehabilitation Clinic, Patras University Hospital, Patras Greece.
General University Hospital of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTest the reliability and validity of the modified Clinical test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (mCTSIB) of the Balance Platform Biodex Balance System (BBS) in a female community dwelling population.

method100 women over 65 years community dwellers mean age 71.8 (SD±6, ranging from 65 to 91) years, were examined using the posturography modified Clinical test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) protocol of the Biodex Balance system SD and the Greek Mini-Best Test (miniBESTest-GR) to assess concurrent validity, with 24 undergoing a second measurement after one week to test the reliability of the method.

resultsThe m-CTSIB-"Composite Score" test was significantly and positively correlated with the mini-BESTest-GR (r= -0.652, p<0.001) indicating good validity properties. The test-retest reliability was measured using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) using a two-way mixed-effects absolute-agreement single-measurement model, among the two measurements of mCTSIB test (test-retest). No statistical difference was found between the two samples (N1=100, N2=24, t= -1.755, df=122, p=0.08). ICC estimates as 0.628 with 95% confident interval=0.31-0.82.

conclusionThe mCTSIB test from the BBS has a moderate validity and reliability to evaluate balance in elderly women living in the community and can be used as a screening tool.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIndependent LivingReproducibility of ResultsVestibular Function TestsAgingBalanceDynamic PlatformmCTSIBminiBEST Test

Identifiers

PMID32481234
PMCPMC7288384
OpenAlexW3032232455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.