Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32480362›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2020

A Digital Library for Increasing Awareness About Living Donor Kidney Transplants: Formative Study.

Amy D Waterman, Emily H Wood, Omesh N Ranasinghe, Amanda Faye Lipsey, Crystal Anderson, Wendy Balliet, Lauren Holland-Carter, Stacey Maurer, Maria Aurora Posadas Salas

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06734819 (Effectiveness of Digital Storytelling in Increasing Living Kidney Donor Recruitment in Canada), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06734819 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Digital Storytelling in Increasing Living Kidney Donor Recruitment in Canada

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsLiving Donor Kidney Transplantation, Health Equity, Patient Education, Narrative MedicineArmsStorytelling Video, Standard Patient Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Decisional Needs of People From Minority Ethnic Groups Around Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A UK Healthcare Professionals' Perspective.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amy D WatermanDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-0060
Emily H WoodDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-4732
Omesh N RanasingheDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2793-4359
Amanda Faye LipseyTerasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0172-4476
Crystal AndersonDivision of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3819-2098
Wendy BallietMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7414-3675
Lauren Holland-CarterMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1448-4988
Stacey MaurerMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5501-3704
Maria Aurora Posadas SalasMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-7154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not common for people to come across a living kidney donor, let alone consider whether they would ever donate a kidney themselves while they are alive. Narrative storytelling, the sharing of first-person narratives based on lived experience, may be an important way to improve education about living donor kidney transplants (LDKTs). Developing ways to easily standardize and disseminate diverse living donor stories using digital technology could inspire more people to consider becoming living donors and reduce the kidney shortage nationally.

objectiveThis paper aimed to describe the development of the Living Donation Storytelling Project, a web-based digital library of living donation narratives from multiple audiences using video capture technology. Specifically, we aimed to describe the theoretical foundation and development of the library, a protocol to capture diverse storytellers, the characteristics and experiences of participating storytellers, and the frequency with which any ethical concerns about the content being shared emerged.

methodsThis study invited kidney transplant recipients who had received LDKTs, living donors, family members, and patients seeking LDKTs to record personal stories using video capture technology by answering a series of guided prompts on their computer or smartphone and answering questions about their filming experience. The digital software automatically spliced responses to open-ended prompts, creating a seamless story available for uploading to a web-based library and posting to social media. Each story was reviewed by a transplant professional for the disclosure of protected health information (PHI), pressuring others to donate, and medical inaccuracies. Disclosures were edited.

resultsThis study recruited diverse storytellers through social media, support groups, churches, and transplant programs. Of the 137 storytellers who completed the postsurvey, 105/137 (76.6%) were white and 99/137 (72.2%) were female. They spent 62.5 min, on average, recording their story, with a final median story length of 10 min (00:46 seconds to 32:16 min). A total of 94.8% (130/137) of storytellers were motivated by a desire to educate the public; 78.1% (107/137) were motivated to help more people become living donors; and 75.9% (104/137) were motivated to dispel myths. The ease of using the technology and telling their story varied, with the fear of being on film, emotional difficulty talking about their experiences, and some technological barriers being reported. PHI, most commonly surnames and transplant center names, was present in 62.9% (85/135) of stories and was edited out.

conclusionsWith appropriate sensitivity to ensure diverse recruitment, ethical review of content, and support for storytellers, web-based storytelling platforms may be a cost-effective and convenient way to further engage patients and increase the curiosity of the public in learning more about the possibility of becoming living donors.

Indexed as

awarenessdiffusion of innovationdigital libraryhealth educationhealth literacyhealth technologyinformed decision-makingkidney diseasesliving donationliving donor kidney transplantmobile phonevideo library

Identifiers

PMID32480362
PMCPMC7404010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.