Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2020
Neuroleptic strategies for terminal agitation in patients with cancer and delirium at an acute palliative care unit: a single-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03021486 (Haloperidol and/or Chlorpromazine for Refractory Agitated Delirium in the Palliative Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Haloperidol and/or Chlorpromazine for Refractory Agitated Delirium in the Palliative Care Unit
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opioid switching to improve delirium symptoms in patients with cancer: a systematic review.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers to healthcare professionals screening, recognizing, and managing delirium in the adult patients receiving specialist palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Care of the adult cancer patient at the end of life: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.ESMO open · 2021Guideline
- Personalized sedation goal for agitated delirium in patients with cancer: Balancing comfort and communication.Cancer · 2021Trial
- Association among rescue neuroleptic use, agitation, and perceived comfort: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial on agitated delirium.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Trial
- Hospice Clinicians' Approaches to Terminal Restlessness: A Qualitative Analysis.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2026Article
- Intravenous haloperidol or chlorpromazine-which is more effective to improve agitation and communication in agitated delirium at the end of life?The oncologist · 2025Article
- Comparing the effect of remimazolam and propofol anesthesia on extubation time, hospital stay and psychological wellbeing post pediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Interpreting a Clinical Trial.Journal of palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Pharmacological Strategies for Pain Relief in Patients with Terminal Delirium: A Secondary Data Analysis.Palliative medicine reports · 2025Article
- Delirium in the ICU: how much do we know? A narrative review.Annals of medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Pharmacological Treatment for Terminal Agitation, Delirium and Anxiety in Frail Older Patients.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effectiveness of antipsychotics for managing agitated delirium in patients with advanced cancer: a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan (Phase-R).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Observational
- Pharmacological and non-pharmacological prevention and management of delirium in critically ill and palliative patients in the inpatient setting: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Enhancing hospice care with psychological support and a nomogram to predict delirium in patients with advanced solid tumors.American journal of cancer research · 2024Article
- Article
- Management of Physical Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Cancer during the Last Weeks and Days of Life.Cancer research and treatment · 2022Review
- Prognostication of the Last Days of Life.Cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe role of neuroleptics for terminal agitated delirium is controversial. We assessed the effect of three neuroleptic strategies on refractory agitation in patients with cancer with terminal delirium.
methodsIn this single-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised trial, patients with advanced cancer, aged at least 18 years, admitted to the palliative and supportive care unit at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA), with refractory agitation, despite low-dose haloperidol, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous haloperidol dose escalation at 2 mg every 4 h, neuroleptic rotation with chlorpromazine at 25 mg every 4 h, or combined haloperidol at 1 mg and chlorpromazine at 12·5 mg every 4 h, until death or discharge. Rescue doses identical to the scheduled doses were administered at inception, and then hourly as needed. Permuted block randomisation (block size six; 1:1:1) was done, stratified by baseline Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores. Research staff, clinicians, patients, and caregivers were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was change in RASS score from time 0 to 24 h. Comparisons among group were done by modified intention-to-treat analysis. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03021486.
findingsBetween July 5, 2017, and July 1, 2019, 998 patients were screened for eligibility, with 68 being enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment; 45 received the masked study interventions (escalation n=15, rotation n=16, combination n=14). RASS score decreased significantly within 30 min and remained low at 24 h in the escalation group (n=10, mean RASS score change between 0 h and 24 h -3·6 [95% CI -5·0 to -2·2]), rotation group (n=11, -3·3 [-4·4 to -2·2]), and combination group (n=10, -3·0 [-4·6 to -1·4]), with no difference among groups (p=0·71). The most common serious toxicity was hypotension (escalation n=6 [40%], rotation n=5 [31%], combination n=3 [21%]); there were no treatment-related deaths.
interpretationOur data provide preliminary evidence that the three strategies of neuroleptics might reduce agitation in patients with terminal agitation. These findings are in the context of the single-centre design, small sample size, and lack of a placebo-only group.
fundingNational Institute of Nursing Research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.