ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Realistic modeling of mesoscopic ephaptic coupling in the human brain.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcranial current stimulation in epilepsy: A systematic review of the fundamental and clinical aspects.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Intermittent tACS during a visual task impacts neural oscillations and LZW complexity.Experimental brain research · 2020Trial
- Intensity-dependent tACS entrainment effects in a cortical microcircuit: a computational study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A historical review of ephaptic field research: from early foundations through contemporary renaissance.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- The goo that binds us: how field resonance solves neuroscience's binding and criticality problems.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Reduced dynamical variability in depression: evidence from EEG and QIF-E network simulation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Calcium Dynamics in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication from Intracellular to Extracellular Signaling.Cells · 2025Review
- Computational modeling of frequency-dependent neocortical response to thalamic neurostimulation in epilepsy.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Scaling up from sentience: modularity, conscious broadcast, and a constitutive solution to the combination problem.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The Algorithmic Agent Perspective and Computational Neuropsychiatry: From Etiology to Advanced Therapy in Major Depressive Disorder.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Consciousness and Energy Processing in Neural Systems.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Thermal effects and ephaptic entrainment in Hodgkin-Huxley model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Neural Geometrodynamics, Complexity, and Plasticity: A Psychedelics Perspective.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Simultaneous recordings from vestibular Type I hair cells and their calyceal afferents in mice.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Is non-invasive neuromodulation a viable technique to improve neuroplasticity in individuals with acquired brain injury? A review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Review
- In vivo ephaptic coupling allows memory network formation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problem.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A Transmissive Theory of Brain Function: Implications for Health, Disease, and Consciousness.NeuroSci · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Several decades of research suggest that weak electric fields may influence neural processing, including those induced by neuronal activity and proposed as a substrate for a potential new cellular communication system, i.e., ephaptic transmission. Here we aim to model mesoscopic ephaptic activity in the human brain and explore its trajectory during aging by characterizing the electric field generated by cortical dipoles using realistic finite element modeling. Extrapolating from electrophysiological measurements, we first observe that modeled endogenous field magnitudes are comparable to those in measurements of weak but functionally relevant self-generated fields and to those produced by noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation, and therefore possibly able to modulate neuronal activity. Then, to evaluate the role of these fields in the human cortex in large MRI databases, we adapt an interaction approximation that considers the relative orientation of neuron and field to estimate the membrane potential perturbation in pyramidal cells. We use this approximation to define a simplified metric (EMOD1) that weights dipole coupling as a function of distance and relative orientation between emitter and receiver and evaluate it in a sample of 401 realistic human brain models from healthy subjects aged 16-83. Results reveal that ephaptic coupling, in the simplified mesoscopic modeling approach used here, significantly decreases with age, with higher involvement of sensorimotor regions and medial brain structures. This study suggests that by providing the means for fast and direct interaction between neurons, ephaptic modulation may contribute to the complexity of human function for cognition and behavior, and its modification across the lifespan and in response to pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.