Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32479414›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Precision Health-Enabled Machine Learning to Identify Need for Wraparound Social Services Using Patient- and Population-Level Data Sets: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Suranga N Kasthurirathne, Shaun Grannis, Paul K Halverson, Justin Morea, Nir Menachemi, Joshua R Vest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Implementing social interventions in primary care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Precision medicine in anesthesiology.International anesthesiology clinics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suranga N KasthurirathneCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6630-4598
Shaun GrannisCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8093-6639
Paul K HalversonRichard M Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-4363
Justin MoreaSchool of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3884-8317
Nir MenachemiCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3411-2700
Joshua R VestCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-9688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging interest in precision health and the increasing availability of patient- and population-level data sets present considerable potential to enable analytical approaches to identify and mitigate the negative effects of social factors on health. These issues are not satisfactorily addressed in typical medical care encounters, and thus, opportunities to improve health outcomes, reduce costs, and improve coordination of care are not realized. Furthermore, methodological expertise on the use of varied patient- and population-level data sets and machine learning to predict need for supplemental services is limited.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to leverage a comprehensive range of clinical, behavioral, social risk, and social determinants of health factors in order to develop decision models capable of identifying patients in need of various wraparound social services.

methodsWe used comprehensive patient- and population-level data sets to build decision models capable of predicting need for behavioral health, dietitian, social work, or other social service referrals within a safety-net health system using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, precision, F1 score, and specificity. We also evaluated the value of population-level social determinants of health data sets in improving machine learning performance of the models.

resultsDecision models for each wraparound service demonstrated performance measures ranging between 59.2%% and 99.3%. These results were statistically superior to the performance measures demonstrated by our previous models which used a limited data set and whose performance measures ranged from 38.2% to 88.3% (behavioural health: F1 score P<.001, AUROC P=.01; social work: F1 score P<.001, AUROC P=.03; dietitian: F1 score P=.001, AUROC P=.001; other: F1 score P=.01, AUROC P=.02); however, inclusion of additional population-level social determinants of health did not contribute to any performance improvements (behavioural health: F1 score P=.08, AUROC P=.09; social work: F1 score P=.16, AUROC P=.09; dietitian: F1 score P=.08, AUROC P=.14; other: F1 score P=.33, AUROC P=.21) in predicting the need for referral in our population of vulnerable patients seeking care at a safety-net provider.

conclusionsPrecision health-enabled decision models that leverage a wide range of patient- and population-level data sets and advanced machine learning methods are capable of predicting need for various wraparound social services with good performance.

Indexed as

delivery of health careintegratedsocial determinants of healthsupervised machine learningwraparound social services

Identifiers

PMID32479414
PMCPMC7380999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.