Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32479377›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2020

Cortical and subcortical response to the anticipation of reward in high and average/low risk-taking adolescents.

Michael I Demidenko, Edward D Huntley, Andrew Jahn, Moriah E Thomason, Christopher S Monk, Daniel P Keating

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael I DemidenkoDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States. Electronic address: demidenm@umich.edu.
Edward D HuntleySurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States.
Andrew JahnThe Functional MRI Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States.
Moriah E ThomasonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone, New York, United States.
Christopher S MonkDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States; Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States.
Daniel P KeatingDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States; Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGYT32HD007109 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GELMAN, SUSAN A., MONK, CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN · 1985 to 2025
$6.6M
Neurodevelopmental Pathways in Adolescent Health Risk BehaviorR01HD075806 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KEATING, DANIEL P · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075806NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first neurodevelopmental models that sought to explain the influx of risky behaviors during adolescence were proposed, there have been a number of revisions, variations and criticisms. Despite providing a strong multi-disciplinary heuristic to explain the development of risk behavior, extant models have not yet reliably isolated neural systems that underlie risk behaviors in adolescence. To address this gap, we screened 2017 adolescents from an ongoing longitudinal study that assessed 15-health risk behaviors, targeting 104 adolescents (Age Range: 17-to-21.4), characterized as high-or-average/low risk-taking. Participants completed the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) fMRI task, examining reward anticipation to "big win" versus "neutral". We examined neural response variation associated with both baseline and longitudinal (multi-wave) risk classifications. Analyses included examination of a priori regions of interest (ROIs); and exploratory non-parametric, whole-brain analyses. Hypothesis-driven ROI analysis revealed no significant differences between high- and average/low-risk profiles using either baseline or multi-wave classification. Results of whole-brain analyses differed according to whether risk assessment was based on baseline or multi-wave data. Despite significant mean-level task activation, these results do not generalize prior neural substrates implicated in reward anticipation and adolescent risk-taking. Further, these data indicate that whole-brain differences may depend on how risk-behavior profiles are defined.

Indexed as

RewardAdolescentAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleYoung AdultAdolescenceAdolescent Health Risk BehaviorsDual SystemsMaturational ImbalanceReward anticipationTriadic

Identifiers

PMID32479377
PMCPMC7262007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.