ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2020
Cortical and subcortical response to the anticipation of reward in high and average/low risk-taking adolescents.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Meta-Analysis of Neural Correlates of Reward Anticipation in Individuals at Clinical Risk for Schizophrenia.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Parental Alcohol Use Predicts Neural Emotion Reactivity and Substance Use Intentions in Early Adolescence.The Journal of early adolescence · 2025Article
- The path from mood symptoms to substance use: A longitudinal examination in individuals with and at risk for bipolar spectrum disorders.Journal of affective disorders · 2024Article
- Identification of a Composite Latent Dimension of Reward and Impulsivity Across Clinical, Behavioral, and Neurobiological Domains Among Youth.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2024Article
- A multi-sample evaluation of the measurement structure and function of the modified monetary incentive delay task in adolescents.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Prenatal androgen influences on the brain: A review, critique, and illustration of research on congenital adrenal hyperplasia.Journal of neuroscience research · 2023Review
- Neural heterogeneity underlying late adolescent motivational processing is linked to individual differences in behavioral sensation seeking.Journal of neuroscience research · 2022Article
- Adolescent novelty seeking is associated with greater ventral striatal and prefrontal brain response during evaluation of risk and reward.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- The ups and downs of relating nondrug reward activation to substance use risk in adolescents.Current addiction reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the first neurodevelopmental models that sought to explain the influx of risky behaviors during adolescence were proposed, there have been a number of revisions, variations and criticisms. Despite providing a strong multi-disciplinary heuristic to explain the development of risk behavior, extant models have not yet reliably isolated neural systems that underlie risk behaviors in adolescence. To address this gap, we screened 2017 adolescents from an ongoing longitudinal study that assessed 15-health risk behaviors, targeting 104 adolescents (Age Range: 17-to-21.4), characterized as high-or-average/low risk-taking. Participants completed the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) fMRI task, examining reward anticipation to "big win" versus "neutral". We examined neural response variation associated with both baseline and longitudinal (multi-wave) risk classifications. Analyses included examination of a priori regions of interest (ROIs); and exploratory non-parametric, whole-brain analyses. Hypothesis-driven ROI analysis revealed no significant differences between high- and average/low-risk profiles using either baseline or multi-wave classification. Results of whole-brain analyses differed according to whether risk assessment was based on baseline or multi-wave data. Despite significant mean-level task activation, these results do not generalize prior neural substrates implicated in reward anticipation and adolescent risk-taking. Further, these data indicate that whole-brain differences may depend on how risk-behavior profiles are defined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.