Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32479328›Full record

Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2020

Lessons learned from a pilot randomized controlled trial of dyadic interpersonal psychotherapy for perinatal depression in a low-income population.

Shannon N Lenze, Mary Anne Potts, Jennifer Rodgers, Joan Luby

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shannon N LenzeDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8504, 660 S Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: slenze@wustl.edu.
Mary Anne PottsDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8504, 660 S Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Jennifer RodgersDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8504, 660 S Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Joan LubyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8504, 660 S Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Perinatal Depression: Dyadic-IPT to Improve Health of Mother and BabyK23MH090245 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LENZE, SHANNON NICOLE · 2011 to 2015
$713k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH090245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal depression is a public health burden impacting mothers and their offspring. This study extended brief-Interpersonal Psychotherapy delivered during pregnancy by incorporating a postpartum attachment based dyadic-component to maintain mother's treatment gains and enhance the mother-infant relationship (called IPT-Dyad). The current report presents data from a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing IPT-Dyad to Enhanced Treatment as Usual (ETAU).

methodsWomen, ages 18 and older, between 12-30 weeks gestation meeting criteria for a depressive disorder were eligible. Participants were randomized to either IPT-Dyad (n = 21) or ETAU (n = 21). Maternal and infant outcomes were assessed through one-year postpartum.

resultsParticipants were primarily African American (77%), single (80%), with low-incomes. Attrition was high in both groups (IPT-Dyad 30%; ETAU 40%). Depression scores improved from baseline in both groups and remained improved over the 12 month follow-up. There were no between group differences on measures of parenting stress, mother-infant interactions, and infant socioemotional functioning. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size of this study was further reduced by attrition, despite efforts to maintain engagement. Reliance on self-report outcome measures is also a limitation.

conclusionsIPT-Dyad may be a promising intervention for perinatal depression with potential benefit for mothers and babies. Treatment engagement and management of psychosocial needs were persistent challenges throughout the postpartum period. Further refinement of intervention content and schedule to better meet the needs and values of under-resourced mothers is needed. Earlier screening; better integration of care within OB settings; and delivering care in conjunction with social service resources may also improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Depressive DisorderInterpersonal PsychotherapyDepressionFemaleHumansInfantPilot ProjectsPovertyPregnancyPsychotherapyTreatment OutcomeInfantsInterpersonal psychotherapyParentingPerinatal depression

Identifiers

PMID32479328
PMCPMC7365269
OpenAlexW3016470292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.