Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32479224›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2020

Buprenorphine Treatment By Primary Care Providers, Psychiatrists, Addiction Specialists, And Others.

Mark Olfson, Victoria Zhang, Michael Schoenbaum, Marissa King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Induction of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark OlfsonMark Olfson (mo49@cumc.columbia.edu) is the Elizabeth K. Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine, and Law in the Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University; a professor of epidemiology in the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; and a research psychiatrist at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, all in New York City.
Victoria ZhangVictoria Zhang is a postdoctoral research associate at the School of Management, Yale University, in New Haven, Connecticut.
Michael SchoenbaumMichael Schoenbaum is a senior adviser for mental health services at the National Institute of Mental Health, in Bethesda, Maryland.
Marissa KingMarissa King is a professor of management and sociology at the School of Management and Department of Sociology, Yale University.

Funding

Social Networks, Physician Characteristics, and Inappropriate Prescribing of Commonly Misused Prescription DrugsR01DA044981 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KING, MARISSA D · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial increases in opioid-related morbidity and mortality have motivated the implementation of federal policies to expand the buprenorphine prescribing capacity of primary care providers and other clinicians. Using a national prescription database that covered 72-92 percent of the US population during 2010-18, we analyzed trends in buprenorphine treatment by prescriber specialty. Buprenorphine treatment rates by primary care providers increased from 12.9 people per 10,000 population in 2010 to 27.4 in 2018. The numbers for psychiatrists and addiction medicine specialists increased from 8.7 to 12.0 per 10,000 and those for other prescribers from 5.8 to 16.3 per 10,000. However, treatment of people ages 15-24 by primary care providers and by psychiatrists and addiction medicine specialists declined significantly. Across all patient age and provider groups, most patients were not retained on buprenorphine for the benchmark period of at least 180 days. Despite a recent national increase in buprenorphine treatment fueled primarily by nonspecialists, challenges persist with buprenorphine access-especially for younger people-and with retaining patients in long-term treatment.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersPsychiatryAdolescentAdultHumansOpiate Substitution TreatmentPrimary Health CareSpecializationYoung AdultBuprenorphineAbuse treatmentAccess to careBuprenorphineDrug usehealth conditionsHealth policyMedical treatmentOpioid use disorderPatient carePrimary care providersPsychiatristsSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID32479224
PMCPMC9097821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.