Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32479117›Full record

SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2021

Assessment of dental age estimation methods applied to Brazilian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ademir Franco, Murilo Navarro de Oliveira, Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal, Cauane Blumenberg, Adriele Alves Pinheiro, Luiz Renato Paranhos

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Observational
  9. Association between dental age variation and EGF, EGFR, TGFB1, and TGFB2 genetic polymorphisms.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Literature reviews: typology and forensic applications.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ademir FrancoDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1417-2781
Murilo Navarro de OliveiraPost-graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Maria Tereza Campos VidigalUndergraduate student, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Cauane BlumenbergPost-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4580-3849
Adriele Alves PinheiroDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Luiz Renato ParanhosDivision of Preventive and Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-0120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the scientific literature of studies on dental age estimation methods applied to Brazilian children.

methodsA systematic literature review was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020136170). Six scientific databases were used as primary search sources (PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO, Embase and Web of Science) and two databases (Open Grey and Open Thesis) were searched to partially select the "grey literature." Only cross-sectional studies were included. The risk of bias was assessed by means of Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for Systematic Reviews. The standardized mean difference (SMD) between the estimated dental and chronological ages was meta-analysed via random effects model.

resultsThe search resulted in 2,527 studies, from which 13 met the eligibility criteria. Out of the eligible studies, 76.92% had low risk of bias and high methodological quality. Ten studies provided proper information to be included in the meta-analysis.The methods and their SMD between estimated and chronological ages were: Willems'=0.05, Lilequist and Lundberg'

conclusionAlthough originally trained in populations worldwide, most of the international methods for radiographical dental age estimation had optimal performance in Brazilian children.

Indexed as

Age Determination by TeethBrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRadiography, PanoramicDental age estimationForensic dentistryGrowth and developmentRadiology

Identifiers

PMID32479117
PMCPMC7860950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.