ReviewCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2021
Adapting STEMI care for the COVID-19 pandemic: The case for low-risk STEMI triage and early discharge.
Review in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in emergency myocardial infarction admissions during COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine: a hospital-based time-series analysis from Western Ukraine.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Interaction of COVID-19 With Common Cardiovascular Disorders.Circulation research · 2023Review
- A Review of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with COVID-19.Heart failure clinics · 2023Review
- A Review of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with COVID-19.Cardiology clinics · 2022Review
- STEMI care 2021: Addressing the knowledge gaps.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2021Review
- E-Triage Systems for COVID-19 Outbreak: Review and Recommendations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Adapting STEMI care for the COVID-19 pandemic: The case for low-risk STEMI triage and early discharge.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2021Review
- Management of STEMI during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned in 2020 to prepare for 2021.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus pandemic has resulted in the need for rapid assessment of resource utilization within our hospital systems. Specifically, the overwhelming need for intensive care unit (ICU) beds within epicenters of the pandemic has created a need for consideration as to how acute coronary syndrome cases, and specifically ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, are managed postprocedure. While most patients in the United States continue to be managed in coronary care units after primary percutaneous coronary intervention, there is a robust literature regarding the ability to triage STEMI patients safely and efficiently with low-risk features to non-ICU beds. We review the various risk scores for STEMI triage and the data supporting their usage. In summary, these findings support an approach to low-risk STEMI triage that does not come at the expense of quality patient care or outcomes, where up to two-thirds of patients with STEMI may be able to be safely managed without ICU-level care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.