Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32478849›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2020

Effects of In-Person Navigation to Address Family Social Needs on Child Health Care Utilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Matthew S Pantell, Danielle Hessler, Dayna Long, Maoya Alqassari, Christine Schudel, Ellen Laves, Denisse E Velazquez, Anais Amaya, Patricia Sweeney, Abigail Burns and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01939704 (Community to Clinic Linkage Program at SFGH), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01939704 nacompletednot on this map

Community to Clinic Linkage Program at SFGH

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2013 to 2019Enrolled1,809ConditionsFamily's Connection to Community Resources and Public Benefits, Caregiver Satisfaction and Connectedness to Clinic, Child Health Care StatusArmsPediatric Primary Care Intervention, Pediatric Urgent Care Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Coproducing a health advocate intervention for pediatric liver transplant recipients using a human-centered design.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. 2024 edition of the Rourke Baby Record.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Factors Associated with Documenting Social Determinants of Health in Electronic Health Records.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Factors Affecting Adherence in Allergic Disorders and Strategies for Improvement.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew S PantellDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco.
Danielle HesslerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Dayna LongCenter for Child and Community Health, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, California.
Maoya AlqassariUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, California.
Christine SchudelUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, California.
Ellen LavesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco.
Denisse E VelazquezSocial Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Anais AmayaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Patricia SweeneySchool of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco.
Abigail BurnsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Francis L HarrisonSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Nancy E AdlerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco.
Laura M GottliebCenter for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco.
University of California, San Francisco · USUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital · USTraining Programs in Epidemiology and Public Health Interventions Network · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCommunity Foundation · USPlanned Parenthood · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While many organizations endorse screening for social risk factors in clinical settings, few studies have examined the health and utilization effects of interventions to address social needs. Objective: To compare the acute care utilization effects of a written resources handout vs an in-person navigation service intervention to address social needs. Design, Settings, and Participants: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, 1809 adult caregivers of pediatric patients seen in primary and urgent care clinics of 2 safety-net hospitals in northern California were recruited between October 13, 2013, and August 27, 2015. Each participating family was randomly assigned to an in-person navigator intervention vs active control to address the family's social needs. Analyses were conducted between February 28, 2018, and September 25, 2019. Interventions: Caregivers either received written information about relevant local resources related to social needs (active control) or met with a patient navigator focused on helping them resolve social needs (navigator intervention). After an initial in-person visit, navigation services included telephone, email, and/or in-person follow-up for up to 3 months. Main Outcome and Measures: Child emergency department visit or hospitalization within 12 months of study enrollment. Results: Among the 1300 caregivers enrolled in the study without missing follow-up data, most spoke English (878 [67.5%]) and were women (1127 [86.7%]), with a mean (SD) age of 33.0 (9.33) years. Most children were aged 0 to 5 years (779 of 1300 [59.9%]), 723 children (55.6%) had Hispanic ethnicity, and 462 children (35.5%) were in excellent health; 840 families (64.6%) were recruited from urgent care. In total, 637 families (49.0%) were randomized to the in-person navigator group and 663 (51.0%) to the active control group. There was no difference in risk of an emergency department visit between the 2 groups. Children enrolled in the in-person navigator group had a decreased risk of hospitalization within 12 months (hazard ratio, 0.59; 05% CI, 0.38-0.94; P = .03), making them 69% less likely to be hospitalized. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial evaluating heath care utilization effects of programs designed to address social needs among families, children enrolled in the navigation group were significantly less likely to be hospitalized after the intervention but equally likely to have an emergency department visit. These findings strengthen our understanding of the effects of addressing social needs in clinical settings as part of a comprehensive strategy to improve health and reduce health care utilization. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01939704.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory CareCaliforniaCaregiversChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalFamilyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansInfantMaleMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID32478849
PMCPMC7265099
OpenAlexW3028621459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.