Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32478816›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2020

Evaluation of a New Criterion for Detecting Prion Disease With Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Alberto Bizzi, Riccardo Pascuzzo, Janis Blevins, Marina Grisoli, Raffaele Lodi, Marco E M Moscatelli, Gianmarco Castelli, Mark L Cohen, Lawrence B Schonberger, Aaron Foutz and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other prion diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto BizziNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo PascuzzoNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Janis BlevinsNational Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Marina GrisoliNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Raffaele LodiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marco E M MoscatelliNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Gianmarco CastelliNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Mark L CohenNational Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lawrence B SchonbergerNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Aaron FoutzNational Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jiri G SafarDepartment of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Brian S ApplebyNational Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Pierluigi GambettiDepartment of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITCase Western Reserve University · USUniversity School · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Neuropathology Core - P GambettiP01AI106705 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GAMBETTI, PIERLUIGI · 2014 to 2018
$7.7M
Structural correlates of prion strain, phenotype and infectivity in human prion dR01NS083687 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GAMBETTI, PIERLUIGI, SUREWICZ, WITOLD K · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
Replication mechanism of human prionsR01NS103848 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SAFAR, JIRI G., SUREWICZ, WITOLD K · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI106705NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083687NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS103848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Early diagnosis is a requirement for future treatment of prion diseases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted images and improved real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have emerged as reliable tests. Objectives: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of diffusion MRI for the diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) with a new criterion (index test) of at least 1 positive brain region among the cortex of the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes; the caudate; the putamen; and the thalamus. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study with a prospective and a retrospective arm was performed from January 1, 2003, to October 31, 2018. MRIs were collected from 1387 patients with suspected sCJD consecutively referred to the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center as part of a consultation service. Intervention: Magnetic resonance imaging. Four neuroradiologists blinded to the diagnosis scored the MRIs of 200 randomly selected patients. One neuroradiologist scored the MRIs of all patients. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of the index test compared with currently used criteria and CSF diagnostic (improved RT-QuIC, 14-3-3, and tau CSF tests). Results: A total of 872 patients matched the inclusion criteria (diffusion MRI and autopsy-confirmed diagnosis), with 619 having sCJD, 102 having other prion diseases, and 151 having nonprion disease. The primary analysis included 200 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [12.9] years; 100 [50.0%] male). Sensitivity of the index test of 4 neuroradiologists was 90% to 95% and superior to sensitivity of current MRI criteria (69%-76%), whereas specificity was 90% to 100% and unchanged. Interrater reliability of the 4 neuroradiologists was high (κ = 0.81), and individual intrarater reliability was excellent (κ ≥0.87). The sensitivity of the index test of 1 neuroradiologist for 770 patients was 92.1% (95% CI, 89.7%-94.1%) and the specificity was 97.4% (95% CI, 93.4%-99.3%) compared with a sensitivity of 69.8% (95% CI, 66.0%-73.4%; P < .001) and a specificity of 98.0% (95% CI, 94.3%-99.6%; P > .99) according to the current criteria. For 88 patients, index test sensitivity (94.9%; 95% CI, 87.5%-98.6%) and specificity (100%; 95% CI, 66.4%-100%) were similar to those of improved RT-QuIC (86.1% [95% CI, 76.5%-92.8%] and 100% [95% CI, 66.4%-100%], respectively). Lower specificities were found for 14-3-3 and tau CSF tests in 452 patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the diagnostic performance of diffusion MRI with the new criterion was superior to that of current standard criteria and similar to that of improved RT-QuIC. These results may have important clinical implications because MRI is noninvasive and typically prescribed at disease presentation.

Indexed as

AgedCerebral CortexCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGray MatterHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32478816
PMCPMC7265127
OpenAlexW3029447364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.