Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32478390›Full record

ReviewEmerging topics in life sciences2020

Nocturnal pollination: an overlooked ecosystem service vulnerable to environmental change.

Callum J Macgregor, Alison S Scott-Brown

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Chlorophyll a fluorescence and biochemical analyses to probe the impacts of artificial light at night on certain ornamental plant species.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mitigating light pollution impacts on arthropods based on light-emitting diode properties.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Potential Regional Pollination Services ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Mitigating the impacts of street lighting on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Colour vision in nocturnal insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Callum J MacgregorLeverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.
Alison S Scott-BrownRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond TW9 3AB, U.K.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing assessments of the ecosystem service of pollination have been largely restricted to diurnal insects, with a particular focus on generalist foragers such as wild and honey bees. As knowledge of how these plant-pollinator systems function, their relevance to food security and biodiversity, and the fragility of these mutually beneficial interactions increases, attention is diverting to other, less well-studied pollinator groups. One such group are those that forage at night. In this review, we document evidence that nocturnal species are providers of pollination services (including pollination of economically valuable and culturally important crops, as well as wild plants of conservation concern), but highlight how little is known about the scale of such services. We discuss the primary mechanisms involved in night-time communication between plants and insect pollen-vectors, including floral scent, visual cues (and associated specialized visual systems), and thermogenic sensitivity (associated with thermogenic flowers). We highlight that these mechanisms are vulnerable to direct and indirect disruption by a range of anthropogenic drivers of environmental change, including air and soil pollution, artificial light at night, and climate change. Lastly, we highlight a number of directions for future research that will be important if nocturnal pollination services are to be fully understood and ultimately conserved.

Indexed as

FlowersPollenAnimalsBiodiversityClimate ChangeCrops, AgriculturalEcosystemEnvironmental PollutionHost-Parasite InteractionsInsectaLightPollinationSeasonsSignal TransductionTime Factorsartificial light at nightbiodiversityclimate changeplant-insect interactionspollinatorspollution

Identifiers

PMID32478390
PMCPMC7326339
OpenAlexW3032129121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.