ArticleFungal systematics and evolution2019
Revisiting
Article in Fungal systematics and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adding a missing piece to the puzzle of oomycete phylogeny: the placement ofFungal systematics and evolution · 2023Article
- Unravelling the Lipids Content and the Fatty Acid Profiles of Eight Recently DescribedMarine drugs · 2023Article
- Eight newPersoonia · 2022Article
- Current Insight into Traditional and Modern Methods in Fungal Diversity Estimates.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Neofunctionalization of Glycolytic Enzymes: An Evolutionary Route to Plant Parasitism in the OomyceteMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Comparative analyses of saprotrophy in Salisapilia sapeloensis and diverse plant pathogenic oomycetes reveal lifestyle-specific gene expression.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2020Article
- Marine Oomycetes of the GenusFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- A Global Survey of Carbohydrate Esterase Families 1 and 10 in Oomycetes.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Holocarpic oomycete parasitoids of red algae are notFungal systematics and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Of the diverse lineages of the Phylum
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.