ArticleACS omega2020
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amorphous selenium nanoparticles: synthesis strategies and multifunctional applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Bioactivity assessment of selenium nanoparticles biosynthesized by Akkermansia muciniphila.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Recent Progress in Selenium Nanomedicines for Ocular Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Demystifying the management of cancer through smart nano-biomedicine via regulation of reactive oxygen species.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Attenuates the Adverse Reactions Triggered by Selenium Nanoparticles without Compromising Their Suppressing Effect on Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Mice Bearing Hepatocarcinoma 22 Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Biogenic Selenium Nanoparticles in Biomedical Sciences: Properties, Current Trends, Novel Opportunities and Emerging Challenges in Theranostic Nanomedicine.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bioconversion of inorganic selenium to less toxic selenium forms by microbes: A review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Selenium as an important factor in various disease states - a review.EXCLI journal · 2022Review
- Selenium nanoparticles produce a beneficial effect in psoriasis by reducing epidermal hyperproliferation and inflammation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Article
- Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Novel Mechanisms Associated with the Antitumor Effect of Chitosan-Stabilized Selenium Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has an extremely poor prognosis, which leads to a significantly decreased overall survival in patients with peritoneal implantation of cancer cells. Administration of sodium selenite by intraperitoneal injection is highly effective in inhibiting PC. Our previous study found that selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) have higher redox activity and safety than sodium selenite. In the present study, we examined the therapeutic effect of SeNPs on PC and elucidated the potential mechanism. Our results revealed that intraperitoneal delivery of SeNPs to cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of mice at a tolerable dose was beneficial for prolonging the survival time of mice, even better than the optimal dose of cisplatin. The underlying mechanism involved in SeNP-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production caused protein degradation and apoptotic response in cancer cells. Interestingly,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.