ArticleACS omega2020
Direct Identification of Amyloid Peptide Fragments in Human α-Synuclein Based on Consecutive Hydrophobic Amino Acids.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tracking proteasome degradation: A cross-organ analysis via intact degradomics mass spectrometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Unique seeding profiles and prion-like propagation of synucleinopathies are highly dependent on the host in human α-synuclein transgenic mice.Acta neuropathologica · 2022Article
- Differences in interaction lead to the formation of different types of insulin amyloid.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Formation of amyloid fibrils by misfolding α-synuclein is a characteristic feature of Parkinson's disease, but the exact molecular mechanism of this process has long been an unresolved mystery. Identification of critical amyloid peptide fragments from α-synuclein may hold the key to decipher this mystery. Focusing on consecutive hydrophobic amino acids (CHAA) in the protein sequence, in this study we proposed a sequence-based strategy for direct identification of amyloid peptide fragments in α-synuclein. We picked out three CHAA fragments (two hexapeptides and one tetrapeptide) from α-synuclein and studied their amyloidogenic property. The thioflavin-T binding test, transmission electron microscopy, Congo red staining, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that although only hexapeptides could undergo amyloid aggregation on their own, extended peptide fragments based on any of the three peptides could form typical amyloid fibrils. Primary amyloidogenic fragments based on the three peptides showed synergetic aggregation behavior and could accelerate the aggregation of full-length α-synuclein. It was proved that hydrophobic interaction played a predominant role for the aggregation of these peptides and full-length α-synuclein. A central alanine-to-lysine substitution in each hydrophobic fragment completely eliminated the peptides' amyloidogenic property, and alanine-to-lysine substitutions at corresponding sites in full-length α-synuclein also decreased the protein's amyloidogenic potency. These findings suggested that CHAA fragments were potentially amyloidogenic and played an important role for the aggregation of α-synuclein. The identification of these fragments might provide helpful information for eventually clarifying the molecular mechanism of α-synuclein aggregation. On the other hand, our study suggested that the CHAA fragment might be a simple motif for direct sequence-based identification of amyloid peptides.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.