Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32478127›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on big data2020

Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research.

Shuang Wang, Luca Bonomi, Wenrui Dai, Feng Chen, Cynthia Cheung, Cinnamon S Bloss, Samuel Cheng, Xiaoqian Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on big data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Private Continuous Survival Analysis with Distributed Multi-Site Data.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. SCOTCH: Secure Counting Of encrypTed genomiC data using a Hybrid approach.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuang WangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Luca BonomiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Wenrui DaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Feng ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Cynthia CheungDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093.
Cinnamon S BlossDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093.
Samuel ChengSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, 74135.
Xiaoqian JiangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.

Funding

iDASH: Integrating Data for Analysis, Anonymization, and SharingU54HL108460 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2010 to 2015
$19.1M
Decentralized differentially-private methods for dynamic data release and analysisR01GM118609 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
Impact of Privacy Environments for Personal Health Data on PatientsR01HG008753 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BLOSS, CINNAMON S · 2015 to 2017
$2.0M
Protection of Records: Privacy (PReP) Technology for Medical ResearchR00LM011392 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN · 2013 to 2015
$650k
Protecting the pRivacy Of Genomes in REsearch StudieS (PROGRESS)R00HG008175 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WANG, SHUANG · 2016 to 2018
$527k
Protect Privacy of Healthcare Data in the CloudR21LM012060 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN · 2014 to 2015
$376k
Protection of Records: Privacy (PReP) Technology for Medical ResearchK99LM011392 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN · 2012 to 2012
$76k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG008175NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008753NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL108460NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118609NLM NIH HHS K99 LM011392NLM NIH HHS R00 LM011392NLM NIH HHS R21 LM012060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical research often involves studying patient data that contain personal information. Inappropriate use of these data might lead to leakage of sensitive information, which can put patient privacy at risk. The problem of preserving patient privacy has received increasing attentions in the era of big data. Many privacy methods have been developed to protect against various attack models. This paper reviews relevant topics in the context of biomedical research. We discuss privacy preserving technologies related to (1) record linkage, (2) synthetic data generation, and (3) genomic data privacy. We also discuss the ethical implications of big data privacy in biomedicine and present challenges in future research directions for improving data privacy in biomedical research.

Indexed as

bioethicsBiomedical researchdata privacydata securitygenome analysis

Identifiers

PMID32478127
PMCPMC7258042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.