ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2020
Chemical Entity Recognition for MEDLINE Indexing.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated indexing in MEDLINE and the Medical Text Indexer (MTI), 2000-2025: a scoping review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
- Chemical identification and indexing in full-text articles: an overview of the NLM-Chem track at BioCreative VII.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- A Systematic Approach to Configuring MetaMap for Optimal Performance.Methods of information in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemical entity recognition is essential for indexing scientific literature in the MEDLINE database at the National Library of Medicine. However, the tool currently used to suggest terms for indexing, the Medical Text Indexer, was not originally conceived as a chemical recognition tool. It has instead been adapted to the task via its use of MetaMap and the addition of in-house patterns and rules. In order to develop a tool more suitable for chemical recognition, we have created a collection of 200 MEDLINE titles and abstracts annotated with genes, proteins, inorganic and organic chemicals, as well as other biological molecules. We use this collection to evaluate eleven chemical entity recognition systems, where we seek to identify a tool that effectively recognizes chemical entities for indexing and also performs well on chemical recognition beyond the indexing task. We observe the highest performance with a SciBERT ensemble.
Identifiers
32477678PMC7233078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.