ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2020
The Evaluation of Clinical Classifications Software Using the National Inpatient Sample Database.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the Performance of Models Trained on Small EHR-Derived Samples by Leveraging External Data with Continual Learning Methods.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Hospital Readmission After Traumatic Brain Injury Hospitalization in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Incidence, causes and prognostic outcomes of acute coma: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan.BMJ open · 2025Article
- The Effect of Length of Stay in Hospital on Patients' Health Outcomes: A Quasi-Experimental Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Maternal pulmonary hypertension and cardiopulmonary outcomes during delivery hospitalization in the United States: A nationwide study from 2016-2020.Pregnancy hypertension · 2024Article
- Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods for risk estimation of delirium in patients hospitalized from the emergency department.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- Coding Disparity and Specificity during Emergency Department Visits after Transitioning to the Tenth Version of the International Classification of Diseases.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Clinical Classifications Software (CCS), by grouping International Classification of Diseases (ICD), provides the capacity to better account for clinical conditions for payers, policy makers, and researchers to analyze outcomes, costs, and utilization. There is a critical need for additional research on application of CCS categories to validate the clinical condition representation and to prevent gaps in research. This study compared the event frequency and ICD codes of CCS categories with significant changes from the first three quarters of 2015 to 2016 using National Inpatient Sample data. A total of 63 of the 285 diagnostics CCS were identified with greater than 20% change, of which 32 had increased and 31 decreased over time. Due to the complexity associated with the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10, more studies are needed to identify the reason for the changes to improve CCS use for ICD-10 and its comparability with ICD-9 based data.
Identifiers
32477676PMC7233079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.