Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477671›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2020

Automating the Transformation of Free-Text Clinical Problems into SNOMED CT Expressions.

Kevin J Peterson, Hongfang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Automated Approach for Identifying Erroneous IS-A Relations in SNOMED CT.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The use of SNOMED CT, 2013-2020: a literature review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin J PetersonDivision of Information Management and Analytics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THOMAS, GAIL D. · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important function of the patient record is to effectively and concisely communicate patient problems. In many cases, these problems are represented as short textual summarizations and appear in various sections of the record including problem lists, diagnoses, and chief complaints. While free-text problem descriptions effectively capture the clinicians' intent, these unstructured representations are problematic for downstream analytics. We present an automated approach to converting free-text problem descriptions into structured Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) expressions. Our methods focus on incorporating new advances in deep learning to build formal semantic representations of summary level clinical problems from text. We evaluate our methods against current approaches as well as against a large clinical corpus. We find that our methods outperform current techniques on the important relation identification sub-task of this conversion, and highlight the challenges of applying these methods to real-world clinical text.

Identifiers

PMID32477671
PMCPMC7233039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.