ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2020
Mental Health Severity Detection from Psychological Forum Data using Domain-Specific Unlabelled Data.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Informatics Research on Mental Health Functioning: Decision Support for the Social Security Administration Disability Program.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Why Do Users of Online Mental Health Communities Get Likes and Reposts: A Combination of Text Mining and Empirical Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health has become a growing concern in the medical field, yet remains difficult to study due to both privacy concerns and the lack of objectively quantifiable measurements (e.g., lab tests, physical exams). Instead, the data that is available for mental health is largely based on subjective accounts of a patient's experience, and thus typically is expressed exclusively in text. An important source of such data comes from online sources and directly from the patient, including many forms of social media. In this work, we utilize the datasets provided by the CLPsych shared tasks in 2016 and 2017, derived from online forum posts of ReachOut which have been manually classified according to mental health severity. We implemented an automated severity labeling system using different machine and deep learning algorithms. Our approach combines both supervised and semi-supervised embedding methods using corpus from ReachOut (both labeled and unlabelled) and WebMD (unlabelled). Metadata, syntactic, semantic, and embedding features were used to classify the posts into four categories (green, amber, red, and crisis). The developed systems outperformed other state-of-the-art systems developed on the ReachOut dataset and obtained the maximum micro- averaged F-scores of 0.86 and 0.80 for CLPsych 2016 and 2017 test datasets, respectively, using the above features.
Identifiers
32477670PMC7233051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.