Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477631›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2020

Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of State-of-the-Art Medication Mapping Tools to Transform a Local Medication Terminology to RxNorm.

Lena Davidson, Mary Regina Boland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Toward a unified understanding of drug-drug interactions: mapping Japanese drug codes to RxNorm concepts.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lena DavidsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Mary Regina BolandDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mapping local terminologies to standardized terminologies facilitates secondary use of electronic health records (EHR). Penn Medicine comprises multiple hospitals and facilities within the Philadelphia Metropolitan area providing services from primary to quaternary care. Our Penn Medicine (PennMed) data include medications collected during both inpatient and outpatient encounters at multiple facilities. Our goal was to map 941,198 unique medication terms to RxNorm, a standardized drug nomenclature from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). We chose three popular tools for mapping: NLM's RxMix and RxNav-in-a-Box, OHDSI's Usagi and Mayo Clinic's MedXN. We manually reviewed 400 mappings obtained from each tool and evaluated their performance for drug name, strength, form, and route. RxMix performed the best with an F1 score of 90% for drug name versus Usagi's 82% and MedXN's 74%. We discuss the strengths and limitations of each method and tips for other institutions seeking to map a local terminology to RxNorm.

Identifiers

PMID32477631
PMCPMC7233099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.