Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477623›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2020

BRret: Retrieval of Brain Research Related Literature.

Mohammad Anani, Matt Kuntz, Indika Kahanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad AnaniMontana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Matt KuntzMontana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Indika KahandaMontana State University, Bozeman, MT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), which is a recently introduced framework for mental illness, utilizes various units of analysis from genetics, neural circuits, etc., for accurate multi-dimensional classification of mental illnesses. Due to the large amount of relevant biomedical research available, automating the process of extracting evidence from the literature to assist with the curation of the RDoC matrix is essential for processing the full breadth of data in an accurate and cost-effective manner. In this work, we formulate the task of information retrieval of brain research literature from general PubMed abstracts. We develop BRret (Brain Research retriever), a novel algorithm for brain research related article retrieval. We use a large dataset of PubMed abstracts annotated with RDoC concepts to demonstrate the effectiveness of BRret. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study aimed at automated retrieval of brain research related literature.

Identifiers

PMID32477623
PMCPMC7233046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.