ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2020
EpithNet: Deep Regression for Epithelium Segmentation in Cervical Histology Images.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adapting DeepLabV3+ for biopsy cervical cancer lesion segmentation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A novel AI-based score for assessing the prognostic value of intra-epithelial lymphocytes in oral epithelial dysplasia.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Digital pathology, deep learning, and cancer: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2024Review
- BestCyte® primary screening of 500 ThinPrep Pap Test thin-layers: 3 Cytologists' Interobserver diagnostic concordance with predicate manual microscopy relative to Truth Reference diagnoses defining NILM, ASCUS+, LSIL+, and ASCH+ thresholds for specificity, sensitivity, and equivalency grading.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023Article
- Automated Nuclear Segmentation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Pathology Reveals Relationships between Cytometric Features and ESTIMATE Stromal and Immune Scores.The American journal of pathology · 2022Article
- Automated Cervical Digitized Histology Whole-Slide Image Analysis Toolbox.Journal of pathology informatics · 2021Article
- Overcoming an Annotation Hurdle: Digitizing Pen Annotations from Whole Slide Images.Journal of pathology informatics · 2021Article
- DeepCIN: Attention-Based Cervical histology Image Classification with Sequential Feature Modeling for Pathologist-Level Accuracy.Journal of pathology informatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutomated pathology techniques for detecting cervical cancer at the premalignant stage have advantages for women in areas with limited medical resources.
methodsThis article presents EpithNet, a deep learning approach for the critical step of automated epithelium segmentation in digitized cervical histology images. EpithNet employs three regression networks of varying dimensions of image input blocks (patches) surrounding a given pixel, with all blocks at a fixed resolution, using varying network depth.
resultsThe proposed model was evaluated on 311 digitized histology epithelial images and the results indicate that the technique maximizes region-based information to improve pixel-wise probability estimates. EpithNet-mc model, formed by intermediate concatenation of the convolutional layers of the three models, was observed to achieve 94% Jaccard index (intersection over union) which is 26.4% higher than the benchmark model.
conclusionsEpithNet yields better epithelial segmentation results than state-of-the-art benchmark methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.