Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477513›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis (loop) gastric bypass for obesity: A prospective comparative study of weight loss and complications.

Abdalla Mustafa, Nayer N H Rizkallah, Nehemiah Samuel, Shlokarth Balupuri

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Comparative Study for Safety and Efficacy of OAGB and SADJB-SG: A Retrospective Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdalla MustafaSunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Nayer N H RizkallahSunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Nehemiah SamuelSunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Shlokarth BalupuriSunderland Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Sunderland Royal Hospital · GBCairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMost Bariatric units perform Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) for weight loss and metabolic purposes with satisfactory results and low complication profile.

objectivesThis study compares LRYGB and OAGB outcomes in a high volume single bariatric unit.

methodsData was collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively for all LRYGB and OAGB performed between Jan 2014 to Dec 2016. The follow up period was for 2 years. Patients who were lost to follow up or had prior bariatric procedure were excluded. Excess weight loss percentage (EWL %), total weight loss percentage (TWL %) and post-operative complications were compared in both groups.

results1268 procedures performed. 113 patients were excluded. At 2 years, for LRYGB and OAGB groups mean TWL % was 31% and 35.4% respectively (P < 0.0001); and mean EWL % was 70.1% and 74.8% respectively (P = 0.0119). Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms were higher in OAGB group 17 (8.5%), with 7 patients needing further surgery, versus 26 (2.7%) in LRYGB (P = 0.0003). There was no difference in incidence of marginal ulcers between LRYGB and OAGB 2.7% vs 5% respectively (P = 0.1115). Internal hernia was seen only in LRYGB patients, 22 (2.2%). There was no significant difference in the re-operation rates following LRYGB 52 (5.4%) and OAGB 16 (8%) (P = 0.1824).

conclusionOAGB had superior short-term weight loss and low complications profile. Both procedures demonstrated no difference in either marginal ulcers or re-operation rates. Reflux symptoms have remained a major side effect of OAGB.

Indexed as

Excess body weightLaparoscopic Roux en y (LRYGB)One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB)Total weight loss

Identifiers

PMID32477513
PMCPMC7251295
OpenAlexW3027819727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.