Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477433›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Exploring learning needs for general practice based pharmacist: Are behavioural and influencing skills needed?

Chris F Johnson, Jan Smith, Heather Harrison, Richard Hassett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chris F JohnsonMRes, MSc, BSc (Hons), PGCert Psych Pharm. Specialist Mental Health and Advanced Prescribing Support Pharmacist Primary Care. Pharmacy Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Clarkston Court. Glasgow (United Kingdom). c.johnson2@nhs.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6006-6605
Jan SmithCPsychol, PhD, MSc, MSc, BSc (Hons), PGCert. Researcher and Chartered Health Psychologist. Pharmacy Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Clarkston Court. Glasgow (United Kingdom). Jan.Smith@ggc.scot.nhs.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-7929
Heather HarrisonMPC, BSc (Hons), PGDip. Senior Prescribing Advisor. Pharmacy Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Clarkston Court. Glasgow (United Kingdom). Heather.Harrison@ggc.scot.nhs.uk.
Richard HassettBA (Hons). Senior Information & Prescribing Analyst. Pharmacy Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Clarkston Court. Glasgow (United Kingdom). richard.hassett@nhs.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-4753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmbedding pharmacists in general practice has been shown to create cost efficiencies, improve patient care and free general practitioner capacity. Consequently, there is a drive to recruit additional pharmacists to work within general practices. However, equipping pharmacists with behaviour and influencing skills may further optimise their impact. Key elements which may enhance behaviour and influencing skills include self-efficacy and resilience.

objectiveThis study aimed to: 1) Assess general practice pharmacists' self-efficacy and resilience. 2) Explore differences primarily between pharmacists reporting lower and higher self-efficacy, secondarily for those reporting lower and higher scores for resilience.

methodsAll 159 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde general practice pharmacists were invited to complete an online survey in May 2019. The survey captured anonymised data covering: demographics; professional experience; qualifications, prescribing status and preferred learning styles. Unconscious learning needs for behavioural and influencing skills were assessed using validated tools: the new general self-efficacy scale (GSES) and short general resilience scale (GRIT). Participants' responses were differentiated by the lowest quartile and higher quartiles of GSES and GRIT scores, and analysed to identify differences.

resultsThe survey was completed by 57% (91/159) of eligible pharmacists; mean age 38 (range 24-60) years; 91% were of white ethnicity and 89% female. The median time qualified was 14 (1-38) years and 3 (1-22) years working in general practices. Overall pharmacists scored well on the GSES, mean 25 (SD 3; 95%CI 24.4-25.6), and GRIT, mean 30 (SD 4; 95%CI 29.6-30.4), out of a maximum 32 and 40 respectively. A significant positive correlation between GSES and GRIT scores was found (Pearson's r=0.284, p=0.006). However, no significant differences were identified between pharmacists scoring in the lower and upper quartiles by GSES or GRIT. Overall respondents reported their preferred learning styles were activists (46%) or pragmatists (29%). The majority (91%) preferred blended learning methods as opposed to 38% or less for a range of online methods.

conclusionsGeneral practice pharmacists on average scored highly for self-efficacy and resilience. Higher scores did not appear to be associated with demographic, years of practice, professional or educational experience. Prospective interventions to support those with lower scores may enhance and optimise pharmacists' effectiveness in general practice.

Indexed as

AdaptationDelivery of Health CareFamily PracticeGeneral PractitionersIntegratedPatient CarePharmacistsPsychologicalResilienceSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID32477433
PMCPMC7243743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.