Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477373›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020

Implications of COVID-19 Outbreak on Immune Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Patients-Lessons Learned From SARS and MERS.

Nora Möhn, Refik Pul, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Harald Prüss, Torsten Witte, Martin Stangel, Thomas Skripuletz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the prescription of multiple sclerosis medication in Germany.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nora MöhnDepartment of Neurology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Refik PulDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christoph KleinschnitzDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Harald PrüssDepartment of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Torsten WitteDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Martin StangelDepartment of Neurology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Thomas SkripuletzDepartment of Neurology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEEssen University Hospital · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic keeps the world in suspense. In addition to the fundamental challenges for the health care system, the individual departments must decide how to deal with patients at risk. Neurologists are confronted with the question, how they should advise their patients regarding immunosuppressive treatment. In particular, the large number of different disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in the treatment of neuroimmunological diseases such as multiple sclerosis poses a challenge. To a limited extent, it might be useful to transfer knowledge from previous SARS- and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus outbreaks in 2002/2003 and 2012 to the current situation. Overall, immunosuppressive therapy does neither seem to have a major impact on infection with SARS- and MERS-CoV nor does it seem to lead to a severe disease course in many cases. Considering the immunological responses against infections with novel coronaviruses in humans, interferons, glatiramer acetate, and teriflunomide appear to be safe. As lymphopenia seems to be associated with a more severe disease course, all DMTs causing lymphopenia, such as cladribine, alemtuzumab, and dimethyl fumarate, need to be reviewed more thoroughly. As they are, in general, associated with a higher risk of infection, depleting anti-CD20 antibodies may be problematic drugs. However, it has to be differentiated between the depletion phase and the phase of immune reconstitution. In summary, previous coronavirus outbreaks have not shown an increased risk for immunocompromised patients. Patients with severe neuroimmunological diseases should be kept from hasty discontinuation of immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansImmunocompromised HostImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusMultiple SclerosisPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Immunosuppressive AgentsCOVID-19DMTsimmunosuppressive therapyMERSmultiple sclerosisSARS

Identifiers

PMID32477373
PMCPMC7235419
OpenAlexW3025377973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.