Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477297›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Chemically Stressed Bacterial Communities in Anaerobic Digesters Exhibit Resilience and Ecological Flexibility.

Benjamin Schwan, Christian Abendroth, Adriel Latorre-Pérez, Manuel Porcar, Cristina Vilanova, Christina Dornack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Bioaugmented Mixed Culture byFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. A lab in the field: applications of real-time,Biology methods & protocols · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin SchwanInstitute of Waste Management and Circular Economy, Technische Universität Dresden, Pirna, Germany.
Christian AbendrothInstitute of Waste Management and Circular Economy, Technische Universität Dresden, Pirna, Germany.
Adriel Latorre-PérezDarwin Bioprospecting Excellence, S.L. Parc Cientific Universitat de València, Paterna, Spain.
Manuel PorcarDarwin Bioprospecting Excellence, S.L. Parc Cientific Universitat de València, Paterna, Spain.
Cristina VilanovaDarwin Bioprospecting Excellence, S.L. Parc Cientific Universitat de València, Paterna, Spain.
Christina DornackInstitute of Waste Management and Circular Economy, Technische Universität Dresden, Pirna, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is a technology known for its potential in terms of methane production. During the digestion process, multiple metabolites of high value are synthesized. However, recent works have demonstrated the high robustness and resilience of the involved microbiomes; these attributes make it difficult to manipulate them in such a way that a specific metabolite is predominantly produced. Therefore, an exact understanding of the manipulability of anaerobic microbiomes may open up a treasure box for bio-based industries. In the present work, the effect of nalidixic acid, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and sodium phosphate on the microbiome of digested sewage sludge from a water treatment plant fed with glucose was investigated. Despite of the induced process perturbations, high stability was observed at the phylum level. However, strong variations were observed at the genus level, especially for the genera

Indexed as

anaerobic digestionanaerobic microbiomesLotka–Volterramicrobiome manipulationpopulation modeling

Identifiers

PMID32477297
PMCPMC7235767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.