Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Mixed-Precision Deep Learning Based on Computational Memory.

S R Nandakumar, Manuel Le Gallo, Christophe Piveteau, Vinay Joshi, Giovanni Mariani, Irem Boybat, Geethan Karunaratne, Riduan Khaddam-Aljameh, Urs Egger, Anastasios Petropoulos and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Training neural networks using physical equations of motion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Enabling Training of Neural Networks on Noisy Hardware.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

S R NandakumarIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Manuel Le GalloIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Christophe PiveteauIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Vinay JoshiIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Giovanni MarianiIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Irem BoybatIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Geethan KarunaratneIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Riduan Khaddam-AljamehIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Urs EggerIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Anastasios PetropoulosIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Theodore AntonakopoulosDepartment of Electrical and Computers Engineering, University of Patras, Rio Achaia, Greece.
Bipin RajendranEngineering Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abu SebastianIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Evangelos EleftheriouIBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have revolutionized the field of artificial intelligence and have achieved unprecedented success in cognitive tasks such as image and speech recognition. Training of large DNNs, however, is computationally intensive and this has motivated the search for novel computing architectures targeting this application. A computational memory unit with nanoscale resistive memory devices organized in crossbar arrays could store the synaptic weights in their conductance states and perform the expensive weighted summations in place in a non-von Neumann manner. However, updating the conductance states in a reliable manner during the weight update process is a fundamental challenge that limits the training accuracy of such an implementation. Here, we propose a mixed-precision architecture that combines a computational memory unit performing the weighted summations and imprecise conductance updates with a digital processing unit that accumulates the weight updates in high precision. A combined hardware/software training experiment of a multilayer perceptron based on the proposed architecture using a phase-change memory (PCM) array achieves 97.73% test accuracy on the task of classifying handwritten digits (based on the MNIST dataset), within 0.6% of the software baseline. The architecture is further evaluated using accurate behavioral models of PCM on a wide class of networks, namely convolutional neural networks, long-short-term-memory networks, and generative-adversarial networks. Accuracies comparable to those of floating-point implementations are achieved without being constrained by the non-idealities associated with the PCM devices. A system-level study demonstrates 172 × improvement in energy efficiency of the architecture when used for training a multilayer perceptron compared with a dedicated fully digital 32-bit implementation.

Indexed as

deep learningin-memory computingmemristive devicesmixed-signal designphase-change memory

Identifiers

PMID32477047
PMCPMC7235420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.