Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477046›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Sensory- and Action-Oriented Embodiment of Neurally-Interfaced Robotic Hand Prostheses.

Giovanni Di Pino, Daniele Romano, Chiara Spaccasassi, Alessandro Mioli, Marco D'Alonzo, Rinaldo Sacchetti, Eugenio Guglielmelli, Loredana Zollo, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo Denaro and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giovanni Di PinoResearch Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction (NeXTlab), Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Daniele RomanoPsychology Department & NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Chiara SpaccasassiPsychology Department & NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro MioliResearch Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction (NeXTlab), Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Marco D'AlonzoResearch Unit of Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction (NeXTlab), Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Rinaldo SacchettiNational Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at Work, Bologna, Italy.
Eugenio GuglielmelliResearch Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centred Technologies, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Loredana ZolloResearch Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centred Technologies, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo Di LazzaroResearch Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo DenaroResearch Unit of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Angelo MaravitaPsychology Department & NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Funding

European Research Council 678908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embodiment is the percept that something not originally belonging to the self becomes part of the body. Feeling embodiment for a prosthesis may counteract amputees' altered image of the body and increase prosthesis acceptability. Prosthesis embodiment has been studied longitudinally in an amputee receiving feedback through intraneural and perineural multichannel electrodes implanted in her stump. Three factors-invasive (vs non-invasive) stimulation, training, and anthropomorphism-have been tested through two multisensory integration tasks: visuo-tactile integration (VTI) and crossing-hand effect in temporal order judgment (TOJ), the former more sensible to an extension of a safe margin around the body and the latter to action-oriented remapping. Results from the amputee participant were compared with the ones from healthy controls. Testing the participant with intraneural stimulation produced an extension of peripersonal space, a sign of prosthesis embodiment. One-month training extended the peripersonal space selectively on the side wearing the prostheses. More and less-anthropomorphic prostheses benefited of intraneural feedback and extended the peripersonal space. However, the worsening of TOJ performance following arm crossing was present only wearing the more trained, despite less anthropomorphic, prosthesis, suggesting that training was critical for our participant to achieve operative tool-like embodiment.

Indexed as

embodimentmultisensory integrationneural interfacerobotic hand prosthesessensory feedback

Identifiers

PMID32477046
PMCPMC7232597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.