Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32477003›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2020

Research nurses as practice facilitators to disseminate an asthma shared decision making intervention.

Lindsay Shade, Kelly Reeves, Jennifer Rees, Lori Hendrickson, Jacqueline Halladay, Rowena J Dolor, Paul Bray, Hazel Tapp

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02047929 (Comparing Traditional and Participatory Dissemination of a Shared Decision Making Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02047929 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing Traditional and Participatory Dissemination of a Shared Decision Making Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2013 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsAsthmaArmsAsthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lindsay Shade1Atrium Health, Department of Family Medicine Research, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.
Kelly Reeves1Atrium Health, Department of Family Medicine Research, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.
Jennifer Rees2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 160 N. Medical Drive, CB 7064, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
Lori Hendrickson3Duke University Medical Center, 2608 Erwin Road, Suite 210, Durham, NC 27705 USA.
Jacqueline Halladay4Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, CB 7595, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7595 USA.
Rowena J Dolor5Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 200 Morris Street, 3rd Floor, Durham, NC 27701 USA.
Paul BrayVidant Medical Group, 2000 Venture Tower Drive, Greenville, NC 27834 USA.
Hazel Tapp1Atrium Health, Department of Family Medicine Research, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPractice facilitation is a method of introducing and sustaining organizational change. It involves the use of skilled healthcare professionals called practice facilitators (PFs) to help address the challenges associated with implementing evidence-based guidelines and complex interventions into practice. PFs provide a framework for translating research into practice by building relationships, improving communication, fostering change, and sharing resources. Nurses are well positioned to serve as PFs for the implementation of complex interventions, however, there is little evidence currently available to describe nurses in this role. Additionally, the best strategies to implement complex interventions into practices are still not fully understood. Combining practice facilitation with the train-the-trainer model has the potential to spread knowledge and skills. Shared decision making (SDM), which involves patients and providers jointly engaging in decisions around treatment options, has been shown to improve outcomes for patients with asthma. The goal of this manuscript is to describe and evaluate the practice facilitation process from the ADAPT-NC Study which successfully utilized research nurses to implement a complex asthma SDM toolkit intervention into primary care practices.

methodsAs part of a larger study, 10 primary care practices were recruited for a facilitator-led dissemination intervention involving a 12-week rollout of an asthma SDM toolkit (trial registration: 1.28.2014, #NCT02047929). An experienced lead PF trained research nurses as PFs from each of the 4 participating practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in a train-the-trainer model utilizing a one-day training event and subsequent remote meetings. Evaluation of PF engagement was measured through process improvement surveys.

resultsOverall, the asthma SDM intervention was successfully implemented within the 4 PBRNs. All 10 facilitator-led practices remained engaged with their PFs, with 8 out of the 10 practices able to incorporate and sustain SDM visits or clinics. Responses from the surveys for process improvement yielded improved PF communication and team dynamics over time.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated effective use of research nurses as practice facilitators during the dissemination of an asthma SDM intervention into primary care practices, adding to the knowledge of best practices by describing a model of large-scale implementation of a complex intervention through practice facilitation with nurses.

trial registration"Comparing Traditional and Participatory Dissemination of a Shared Decision Making Intervention" was retrospectively registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ on January 28th, 2014 (NCT02047929).

Indexed as

AsthmaDisseminationImplementationInterventionNursePractice facilitationShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID32477003
PMCPMC7236364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.