ArticleCurrent genomics2019
Computational Prediction of Ubiquitination Proteins Using Evolutionary Profiles and Functional Domain Annotation.
Article in Current genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibition of virally induced TFEB proteasomal degradation as a host-centric therapeutic approach for coronaviral infection.Science advances · 2025Article
- Identification genetic variations in some heat shock protein genes of Tali goat breed and study their structural and functional effects on relevant proteins.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023Article
- Thirty years of molecular dynamics simulations on posttranslational modifications of proteins.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2022Review
- Impact of deleterious missense PRKCI variants on structural and functional dynamics of protein.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUbiquitination, as a post-translational modification, is a crucial biological process in cell signaling, apoptosis, and localization. Identification of ubiquitination proteins is of fundamental importance for understanding the molecular mechanisms in biological systems and diseases. Although high-throughput experimental studies using mass spectrometry have identified many ubiquitination proteins and ubiquitination sites, the vast majority of ubiquitination proteins remain undiscovered, even in well-studied model organisms.
objectiveTo reduce experimental costs, computational methods have been introduced to predict ubiquitination sites, but the accuracy is unsatisfactory. If it can be predicted whether a protein can be ubiquitinated or not, it will help in predicting ubiquitination sites. However, all the computational methods so far can only predict ubiquitination sites.
methodsIn this study, the first computational method for predicting ubiquitination proteins without relying on ubiquitination site prediction has been developed. The method extracts features from sequence conservation information through a grey system model, as well as functional domain annotation and subcellular localization.
resultsTogether with the feature analysis and application of the relief feature selection algorithm, the results of 5-fold cross-validation on three datasets achieved a high accuracy of 90.13%, with Matthew's correlation coefficient of 80.34%. The predicted results on an independent test data achieved 87.71% as accuracy and 75.43% of Matthew's correlation coefficient, better than the prediction from the best ubiquitination site prediction tool available.
conclusionOur study may guide experimental design and provide useful insights for studying the mechanisms and modulation of ubiquitination pathways. The code is available at: https://github.com/Chunhuixu/UBIPredic_QWRCHX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.