Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32476563›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Procedural Volume and Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Kerala, India: Report of the Cardiological Society of India-Kerala Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.

Abdullakutty Jabir, Anoop Mathew, Yinggan Zheng, Cynthia Westerhout, Sunitha Viswanathan, Placid Sebastian, Prasanna Kumar, Sripal Bangalore, Kevin R Bainey, Robert Welsh

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdullakutty JabirDivision of Cardiology Lisie Hospital Kochi Kerala India.
Anoop MathewCanadian VIGOUR Centre Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Yinggan ZhengCanadian VIGOUR Centre Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Cynthia WesterhoutCanadian VIGOUR Centre Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Sunitha ViswanathanDivision of Cardiology Government Medical College Hospital Thiruvanathapuram Kerala India.
Placid SebastianDivision of Cardiology Pariyaram Medical College Hospital Kannur Kerala India.
Prasanna KumarJubilee Medical College Hospital and Research Centre Thrissur Kerala India.
Sripal BangaloreDivision of Cardiology NYU Langone Health New York NY.
Kevin R BaineyCanadian VIGOUR Centre Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Robert WelshCanadian VIGOUR Centre Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There are limited data to inform policy mandating primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) volume benchmarks for catheterization laboratories in low- and middle-income countries. Methods and Results This prospective state-wide registry included ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients with symptoms of <12 hours, or with ongoing ischemia at 12 to 24 hours, reperfused with PPCI. From June 2013 to March 2016, we recruited 5560 consecutive patients. We categorized hospitals on the basis of annual PPCI volumes into low, medium, and high volume (<100, 100-199, and ≥200 PPCIs per year, respectively). Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used to examine the association between PPCI volume and 1-year mortality. Among 42 recruiting hospitals, there were 24 (57.2%) low-volume, 8 (19%) medium-volume, and 10 (23.8%) high-volume hospitals. The median (25th-75th percentile) TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction risk score was 3 (2-5). Cardiac arrest before admission occurred in 4.2%, 2.1%, and 2.9% of cases at low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively (

Indexed as

AdultAgedBenchmarkingFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesQuality Indicators, Health CareRegistriespercutaneous coronary interventionstentsST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID32476563
PMCPMC7429028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.