Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32476147›Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2020

Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics on dental patients.

Lucas Arrais Campos, Mariana Andrade Costa, Fernanda Saullome Sampaio Bonafé, João Marôco, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Measuring concern about smile appearance among adults.European journal of orthodontics · 2024
    Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucas Arrais CamposSchool of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, Brazil.
Mariana Andrade CostaSchool of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, Brazil.
Fernanda Saullome Sampaio BonaféSchool of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, Brazil.
João MarôcoWilliam James Center for Research (WJCR), University Institute of Psychological, Social, and Life Sciences (ISPA), Lisbon, Portugal.
Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini CamposSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRISPA - Instituto Universitário · PT

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #2016/00043-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #2018/06739-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the contribution of demographic and clinical characteristics on the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics of dental patients.

methodsThe psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics was assessed by the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ). Data validity was estimated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed using standardised Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α). A structural model was developed to assess the contribution of demographic and clinical characteristics to the results. The fit of the model was evaluated and the z test (α = 5%) was used to estimate the significance of the contributions (β).

resultsA total of 505 dental patients (80% female; age: 36.3, SD = 11.4) participated in the study. Data showed adequate validity (CFA: χ

conclusionsDemographic and clinical characteristics should be considered in the evaluation of the impact of dental aesthetics on individuals'. Moreover, PIDAQ is an alternative tool for clinical evaluation of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics because it provides valid and reliable data.

Indexed as

Esthetics, DentalQuality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesDental aestheticsfactor analysispsychometricsstructural equation modellingvalidation studies

Identifiers

PMID32476147
PMCPMC9379174
OpenAlexW3028783259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.