ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research2020
Development and Validation of Fidelity Monitoring and Enhancement in an Evidence-Based Parenting Program.
Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parent training tailored for parents with ADHD: a randomized controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Online-delivered parenting intervention for young children with disruptive behavior problems: a noninferiority trial focused on child and parent outcomes.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2022Trial
- Development of the ROOTS Intervention: A Culturally Relevant Parenting Program for Promoting the Emotional and Physical Health of Young Children.Journal of community psychology · 2026Article
- The ROOTS Parenting Intervention to Improve Child Emotional and Physical Health: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial for Black and Latiné Families.Journal of marital and family therapy · 2025Article
- The Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Implementors' Fidelity of Instructional Strategies During Handwashing Acquisition in Children with Autism.Journal of developmental and physical disabilities · 2024Article
- The Case for Assessing and Reporting on Facilitator Fidelity: Introducing the Fidelity of Implementation in Parenting Programs Guideline.Global implementation research and applications · 2024Article
- The Triple P System of Evidence-Based Parenting Support: Past, Present, and Future Directions.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2023Article
- Five-year fidelity assessment of an evidence-based parenting program (GenerationPMTO): inter-rater reliability following international implementation.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The Change of Practitioner's Self-Efficacy in Triple P Professional Training: Moderating Role of Practitioner Characteristics, Country, and Delivery Mode.Journal of child and family studies · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This article adds to current research by examining treatment fidelity of an evidence-based parenting program (namely Triple P) as part of a large clinical trial which included a range of procedures for promoting fidelity including both expert and peer supervision. Procedures for monitoring and promoting fidelity are described, and two major aspects of fidelity, namely content adherence and process fidelity, were evaluated. All treatment sessions for 166 families participating in the Standard Triple P-Positive Parenting Program were video-recorded and then sampled for evaluation without advanced knowledge by delivery practitioners. Independent coders at an external site assessed content adherence and rated delivery process. Fidelity promotion included high-quality training of practitioners on a standardized protocol, ongoing clinical supervision by peers and supervisors, and fidelity feedback sessions. Average content fidelity was consistently high (i.e., over 80%). Process fidelity scores were similarly high across sessions. A brief survey indicated practitioners found that the fidelity and implementation model was useful and contributed to increasing self-efficacy over the course of the initiative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.