Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32476089›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2021

Simple oral exercise with chewing gum for improving oral function in older adults.

Hyo-Jung Kim, Joo-Young Lee, Eun-Song Lee, Hyo-Jung Jung, Hyung-Joon Ahn, Hoi In Jung, Baek-Il Kim

Open access · greenAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Dental Care for Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Influential Factors of Masticatory Performance in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyo-Jung KimDepartment of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 120-752, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joo-Young LeeDepartment of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 120-752, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Song LeeDepartment of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 120-752, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyo-Jung JungDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Joon AhnDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hoi In JungDepartment of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 120-752, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Baek-Il KimDepartment of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 120-752, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. drkbi@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-2327
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 316071031HD020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs general and oral health are closely interrelated, promoting oral health may extend a healthy life expectancy.

aimsTo evaluate the long-term effects of simple oral exercise (SOE) and chewing gum exercise on mastication, salivation, and swallowing function in adults aged ≥ 65 years.

methodsNinety-six participants were assigned to control, SOE, and GOE (chewing gum exercise with SOE) groups. The SOE comprised exercises to improve mastication, salivation, and swallowing function. Control group participants performed no exercises. The intervention period was 8 weeks, followed by a 3-week maintenance period. The Mixing Ability Index (MAI), occlusal force, unstimulated saliva, and repetitive saliva swallowing test were evaluated at baseline and 2, 5, 8, and 11 weeks later. Self-reported discomfort was re-evaluated after 8 weeks.

resultsAfter 8 weeks, mean MAI differences from baseline significantly increased in both groups; the increase in the GOE group was largest and four times higher than in the control group. Mean differences of occlusal force from baseline increased by 56 N (SOE group) and 60 N (GOE group). The increase of salivation was greater in the SOE (3.6-fold) and GOE (2.2-fold) groups than in the control group. Furthermore, 27% and 18% of SOE and GOE group participants, respectively, were re-categorized as having good swallowing function. Participants reported less discomfort as oral functions improved. DISCUSSION: These findings may facilitate the development of clinical practice guidelines for optimal oral care in older adults.

conclusionWhile both SOE and GOE may improve oral function in older adults, GOE is recommended for those with impaired mastication.

trial registrationKCT0003305, retrospectively registered 31/10/2018.

Indexed as

Chewing GumDeglutitionSalivaAgedExerciseHumansSalivationChewing GumChewing gumDry mouthMasticationOlder adultSwallowingXerostomia

Identifiers

PMID32476089
OpenAlexW3030132709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.