ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2020
Survival outcomes of Asian younger men (< 55 years) undergoing radical prostatectomy: a review of prostate cancer database in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival Rate and Prognostic Factors of Localised Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Countries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Pooled it
- Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with prostate cancer.ESMO open · 2022Guideline
- Early-Onset Prostate Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Biology, Clinical Features, Management, and Early Detection.MedComm · 2026Review
- Tumor characteristics, treatments, and oncological outcomes of prostate cancer in men aged ≤60 years: real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProstate cancer largely affects older men. This study aims to investigate prostate cancer in younger men (< 55 years) to shed light on the survival outcomes of this unique subset of patients in Asian context.
methodsData were obtained from the Singapore General Hospital Prostate Cancer Registry. Data on all men with clinically organ confined prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1998 and 2016 were obtained from the registry. Tumor characteristics, follow-up data, and cause of death were acquired.
resultsA total of 1120 men underwent radical prostatectomy between 1998 and 2016. Of these, 12 were aged ≤ 44 years, 106 were aged 45-54 years, 596 were aged 55-64, 397 were aged 65-74 and 9 were aged ≥ 75. There was no difference across age groups when comparing Gleason ≤ 7 vs Gleason ≥ 8 disease, T1/2 vs T3/4 disease and the median PSA values were similar. No difference was observed in overall survival or prostate cancer specific survival among 4 age groups (≤ 44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74) (p = 0.156 and p = 0.227 respectively). Although there was a trend of increasing rate of biochemical recurrence for older patients, it's not statistically significant (p = 0.157). Time to biochemical recurrence was similar as well (p = 0.257).
conclusionThis large cohort of Asian patients who underwent radical prostatectomy did not show significant age-related differences in important parameters and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.