Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32476050›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2020

Efficacy of telemedicine for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zehao Huang, Siyu Wu, Ting Yu, Ailing Hu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Implementing telemedicine in urogynecology: A feasibility study.International urogynecology journal · 2023
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zehao HuangSchool of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Siyu WuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ting YuRN, Nursing Department, Lingnan Branch of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 2693 Kaichuang Street, Huangpu District, Guangzhou, China. 524208040@qq.com.
Ailing HuRN, Nursing Department, Lingnan Branch of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 2693 Kaichuang Street, Huangpu District, Guangzhou, China. h-ailing@163.com.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to summarize the available evidence and assess the efficacy of telemedicine for urinary incontinence in women.

methodsPUBMED, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were electronically searched to identify eligible studies updated to February 2020 to collect RCTs regarding the efficacy of telemedicine for urinary incontinence in women. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

resultsSeven studies involving a total of 836 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with usual care, telemedicine intervention significantly reduced the UI severity (SMD = -0.90, 95% CI, -1.73 - -0.07, P = 0.003) and improved QOL (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.21-1.20, P = 0.005). The results of the descriptive analysis indicated that telemedicine intervention can also reduce the patients' anxiety and depression, improving patients' self-efficacy and their impression of improvement.

conclusionThe systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that telemedicine can reduce the UI severity and anxiety and depression, improving QOL, self-efficacy, and impression of improvement for women with urinary incontinence. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, rigorous studies with adequate sample sizes are required to conclude with more confidence.

Indexed as

TelemedicineUrinary IncontinenceAnxietyFemaleHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMeta-analysisSystematic reviewTelemedicineUrinary incontinenceWoman

Identifiers

PMID32476050
OpenAlexW3030138641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.