Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32476017›Full record

ReviewDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2021

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment.

M Fabbi, E R C Hagens, M I van Berge Henegouwen, S S Gisbertz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Performance of a consensus-based algorithm for diagnosing anastomotic leak after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M FabbiFondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, Milan, Italy.
E R C HagensDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M I van Berge HenegouwenDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S S GisbertzDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications after esophagectomy and is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Several projects ranging from small retrospective studies to large collaborations have aimed to identify potential pre- and perioperative risk factors and to improve the diagnostic processes and management. Despite the increase in available literature, many aspects of anastomotic leakage are still debated, without the existence of widely accepted guidelines. The purpose of this review is to provide a cutting edge overview of the recent literature regarding the definition and classification of anastomotic leakage, risk factors, novel diagnostic modalities, and emerging therapeutic options for treatment and prevention of anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsanastomotic dehiscenceanastomotic leakageesophageal canceresophageal resectiongastric tube reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID32476017
PMCPMC7801633
OpenAlexW3030941560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.