Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32475607›Full record

ReviewKidney international2020

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in nephropathology.

Jan U Becker, David Mayerich, Meghana Padmanabhan, Jonathan Barratt, Angela Ernst, Peter Boor, Pietro A Cicalese, Chandra Mohan, Hien V Nguyen, Badrinath Roysam

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06690190 (Artificial Intelligence-based Techniques to Characterize KIdney Microstructure on Histological ImagEs), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06690190 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Artificial Intelligence-based Techniques to Characterize KIdney Microstructure on Histological ImagEs

TypeobservationalSponsorMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchRan2024 to 2034Enrolled100ConditionsEnd-Stage Renal Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jan U BeckerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: janbecker@gmx.com.
David MayerichDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Meghana PadmanabhanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jonathan BarrattThe Mayer IgA Nephropathy Laboratories, Department of Cardiovascular, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Angela ErnstFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Peter BoorInstitute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen, Germany; Department of Nephrology, RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Pietro A CicaleseCollege of Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chandra MohanCollege of Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hien V NguyenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Badrinath RoysamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Structural and Molecular Phenotyping of Embryonic Development through Multi-Modal Optical ImagingR01HL146745 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI MAYERICH, DAVID · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) for the purpose of this review is an umbrella term for technologies emulating a nephropathologist's ability to extract information on diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy responsiveness from native or transplant kidney biopsies. Although AI can be used to analyze a wide variety of biopsy-related data, this review focuses on whole slide images traditionally used in nephropathology. AI applications in nephropathology have recently become available through several advancing technologies, including (i) widespread introduction of glass slide scanners, (ii) data servers in pathology departments worldwide, and (iii) through greatly improved computer hardware to enable AI training. In this review, we explain how AI can enhance the reproducibility of nephropathology results for certain parameters in the context of precision medicine using advanced architectures, such as convolutional neural networks, that are currently the state of the art in machine learning software for this task. Because AI applications in nephropathology are still in their infancy, we show the power and potential of AI applications mostly in the example of oncopathology. Moreover, we discuss the technological obstacles as well as the current stakeholder and regulatory concerns about developing AI applications in nephropathology from the perspective of nephropathologists and the wider nephrology community. We expect the gradual introduction of these technologies into routine diagnostics and research for selective tasks, suggesting that this technology will enhance the performance of nephropathologists rather than making them redundant.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareartificial intelligencecomputerconvolutional neural networkimage recognitionnephropathology

Identifiers

PMID32475607
PMCPMC8906056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.