ReviewNeurosurgery clinics of North America2020
Automation Advances in Stereoelectroencephalography Planning.
Review in Neurosurgery clinics of North America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Automatic Path-Planning Techniques for Minimally Invasive Stereotactic Neurosurgical Procedures-A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Phantom and in vivo validation of a novel contactless registration method for robot-assisted SEEG surgery.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2025Article
- A Computational Framework for Automated Puncture Trajectory Planning in Hemorrhagic Stroke Surgery.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Computer-assisted stereoelectroencephalography planning: center-specific priors enhance planning.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) in Neurosurgery: Unexplored Path Towards Personalized Brain Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical Applicability and Safety of Conventional Frame-Based Stereotactic Techniques for Stereoelectroencephalography.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2024Article
- A Web-based Interface for Visualizing and Documenting SEEG Strategic Planning (WISP): Development and Qualitative Evaluation.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Optimization of patient-specific stereo-EEG recording sensitivity.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Refining Planning for Stereoelectroencephalography: A Prospective Validation of Spatial Priors for Computer-Assisted Planning With Application of Dynamic Learning.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The past decade has seen a significant shift in the number of centers performing intracranial electroencephalography from subdural grids and strips to stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Unlike grid and strip insertion or other stereotactic procedures in which the cortical surface is visualized, SEEG involves insertion of an electrode through a bolt anchored into the skull. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of SEEG trajectory planning, it often is time-consuming and iterative. Computer-assisted planning improves time taken and efficacy of SEEG trajectory planning. This article provides an overview of the considerations, controversies, and practicalities of implementing an automated computer-assisted planning solution for SEEG planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.