Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32475441›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Quantitative assessment of biosecurity in broiler farms using Biocheck.UGent in Central Luzon, Philippines.

N C Tanquilut, M V O Espaldon, D F Eslava, R C Ancog, C D R Medina, M G V Paraso, R D Domingo, J Dewulf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Factors Affecting Poultry Producers' Attitudes towards Biosecurity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

N C TanquilutCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Pampanga State Agricultural University, Magalang, Pampanga, Philippines; School of Environmental Science and Management, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines. Electronic address: neil@psau.edu.ph.
M V O EspaldonSchool of Environmental Science and Management, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
D F EslavaSchool of Environmental Science and Management, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
R C AncogSchool of Environmental Science and Management, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
C D R MedinaCrop Protection Cluster, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
M G V ParasoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines.
R D DomingoBureau of Animal Industry, Department of Agriculture, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
J DewulfUnit of Veterinary Epidemiology, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biosecurity status of 397 broiler farms in Central Luzon, the highest poultry meat-producing region in the Philippines, was assessed using Biocheck.Ugent. This online biosecurity assessment tool quantifies biosecurity level or compliance of surveyed farms. The system generates scores that reflect the current biosecurity status of each farm in terms of the different external and internal biosecurity measures being implemented in each farm. It was initially developed for pigs and broilers but recently is available for layers, swine, and cattle (beef, dairy, and veal). The overall biosecurity score of broiler farms in Central Luzon was 71.2%, with average external and internal biosecurity scores of 68.5 and 77.2%, respectively. Bataan had the highest biosecurity scores (76.5%) compared with the other 6 provinces. This was also true for the external and internal biosecurity scores of the province, with mean scores of 72.1 and 80.1%, respectively. Of the 11 subcategories of external and internal biosecurity that were assessed, purchase of day-old chicks, feeds and water supply, supply of materials, cleaning and disinfection, and materials between compartments had scores higher than the global scores. Low scores were generated from transport of live animals and infrastructure and biological vectors. The mean biosecurity score of farms with traditional/conventional type of housing was 7.8% lower than that with tunnel vent housing. Every year as the farm gets older, there was a corresponding drop of 0.2% in the biosecurity score. Biosecurity measures are in place in broiler farms in the country. However, there were areas with low scores which need to be prioritized to improve and upgrade the farms' biosecurity status. To date, this is the first quantitative assessment of biosecurity in broiler farms in the Philippines. High biosecurity scores may entail greater protection from disease incursion.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsChickensPhilippinesPoultry DiseasesAnti-Infective AgentsBiocheck.UGentbiosecurity assessmentbiosecurity scoring tool

Identifiers

PMID32475441
PMCPMC7597688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.