Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32475430›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Feeding of yeast cell wall extracts during a necrotic enteritis challenge enhances cell growth, survival and immune signaling in the jejunum of broiler chickens.

Casey N Johnson, Mohammed M Hashim, Christopher A Bailey, James A Byrd, Michael H Kogut, Ryan J Arsenault

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single or Combined Supplementation ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Casey N JohnsonDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Mohammed M HashimDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Christopher A BaileyDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
James A ByrdUSDA - ARS, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Michael H KogutUSDA - ARS, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Ryan J ArsenaultDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. Electronic address: rja@udel.edu.
Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotic enteritis (NE) is one of the most common and costly diseases in the modern broiler industry, having an estimated economic impact of $6 billion dollars annually. Increasing incidents of NE have resulted from restrictions on the use of antibiotic feed additives throughout the broiler industry. As such, finding effective antibiotic alternatives has become a priority. In this study, an experimental model of NE was used, comprising a commercial infectious bursal disease virus vaccine and Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) inoculation. Yeast cells wall (YCW) components, β-glucan (BG), and mannoproteins (MPTs) were evaluated for their effects on disease development. Chicken-specific immunometabolic kinome peptide arrays were used to measure differential phosphorylation between control (uninfected), challenged (infected), and challenged and treated birds in duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tissues. Treatment groups included crude YCW preparation, BG, MPT, or BG+MPT as feed additives. Data analysis revealed kinome profiles cluster predominantly by tissue, with duodenum showing the greatest relative signaling and jejunum showing the greatest response to treatment. BG, MPT, and BG+MPT cluster together, separate from controls and challenge birds in each tissue. Changes in signaling resulting from the treatments were observed in cell growth and survival responses as well as immune responses. None of the treatments of disease challenge returned the profiles to control-like. This is attributable to immune modulation and metabolic effects of the treatments generating distinct profiles from control. Importantly, all the treatments are distinct from the challenge group despite being challenged themselves. Only BG+MPT treatment had a significant effect on bird weight gain compared with the NE challenge group, and this treatment had the greatest impact on gut tissue signaling in all segments. The signaling changes elicited by BG+MPT during an NE challenge were increased cell growth and survival signaling, reducing cell death, apoptosis and innate inflammatory responses, and generating compensatory signaling to reduce disease severity.

Indexed as

ChickensAnimalsCell WallEnteritisImmunity, InnateLongevityNecrosisPoultry DiseasesSignal TransductionYeast, Driedbroilerimmunitykinomenecrotic enteritisyeast cell wall

Identifiers

PMID32475430
PMCPMC7597693
OpenAlexW3015845141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.