ArticlePoultry science2020
Accuracy of genomic prediction of shell quality in a White Leghorn line.
Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of different genotyping and selection strategies in laying hen breeding programs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- OMICs approaches and technologies for understanding low-high feed efficiency traits in chicken: implication to breeding.Animal biotechnology · 2023Review
- Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022Review
- Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Candidate Genes and Signaling Pathways Associated With Feed Efficiency in Xiayan Chicken.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several genomic methods were applied for predicting shell quality traits recorded at 4 different hen ages in a White Leghorn line. The accuracies of genomic prediction of single-step GBLUP and single-trait Bayes B were compared with predictions of breeding values based on pedigree-BLUP under single-trait or multitrait models. Breaking strength (BS) and dynamic stiffness (Kdyn) measurements were collected on 18,524 birds from 3 consecutive generations, of which 4,164 animals also had genotypes from an Affymetrix 50K panel containing 49,591 SNPs after quality control edits. All traits had low to moderate heritability, ranging from 0.17 for BS to 0.34 for Kdyn. The highest accuracies of prediction were obtained for the multitrait single-step model. The use of marker information resulted in higher prediction accuracies than pedigree-based models for almost all traits. A genome-wide association study based on a Bayes B model was conducted to detect regions explaining the largest proportion of genetic variance. Across all 8 shell quality traits analyzed, 7 regions each explaining over 2% of genetic variance and 54 regions each explaining over 1% of genetic variance were identified. The windows explaining a large proportion of genetic variance overlapped with several potential candidate genes with biological functions linked to shell formation. A multitrait repeatability model using a single-step method is recommended for genomic evaluation of shell quality in layer chickens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.