Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32475416›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Accuracy of genomic prediction of shell quality in a White Leghorn line.

A Wolc, W Drobik-Czwarno, T Jankowski, J Arango, P Settar, J E Fulton, R L Fernando, D J Garrick, J C M Dekkers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A WolcDepartment of Animal Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1178, USA; Hy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA 50063, USA. Electronic address: awolc@iastate.edu.
W Drobik-CzwarnoDepartment of Animal Genetics and Conservation, Institute of Animal Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
T JankowskiNutribiogen, 61-039 Poznan, Poland.
J ArangoHy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA 50063, USA.
P SettarHy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA 50063, USA.
J E FultonHy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA 50063, USA.
R L FernandoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1178, USA.
D J GarrickDepartment of Animal Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1178, USA.
J C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1178, USA.
Hy-Line (United States) · USIowa State University · USWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several genomic methods were applied for predicting shell quality traits recorded at 4 different hen ages in a White Leghorn line. The accuracies of genomic prediction of single-step GBLUP and single-trait Bayes B were compared with predictions of breeding values based on pedigree-BLUP under single-trait or multitrait models. Breaking strength (BS) and dynamic stiffness (Kdyn) measurements were collected on 18,524 birds from 3 consecutive generations, of which 4,164 animals also had genotypes from an Affymetrix 50K panel containing 49,591 SNPs after quality control edits. All traits had low to moderate heritability, ranging from 0.17 for BS to 0.34 for Kdyn. The highest accuracies of prediction were obtained for the multitrait single-step model. The use of marker information resulted in higher prediction accuracies than pedigree-based models for almost all traits. A genome-wide association study based on a Bayes B model was conducted to detect regions explaining the largest proportion of genetic variance. Across all 8 shell quality traits analyzed, 7 regions each explaining over 2% of genetic variance and 54 regions each explaining over 1% of genetic variance were identified. The windows explaining a large proportion of genetic variance overlapped with several potential candidate genes with biological functions linked to shell formation. A multitrait repeatability model using a single-step method is recommended for genomic evaluation of shell quality in layer chickens.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsBayes TheoremBreedingChickensEgg ShellFemaleGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsMaleeggshell qualitygenomic predictionGWASwhite layers

Identifiers

PMID32475416
PMCPMC7597664
OpenAlexW3011506754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.