Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32475342›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2020

Use and uptake of web-based therapeutic interventions amongst Indigenous populations in Australia, New Zealand, the United States of America and Canada: a scoping review.

Rachel Reilly, Jacqueline Stephens, Jasmine Micklem, Catalin Tufanaru, Stephen Harfield, Ike Fisher, Odette Pearson, James Ward

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Young People Talk About Digital Support for Mental Health: An Online Survey of 15-30-Year Olds in New Zealand.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel ReillyAboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. rachel.reilly@sahmri.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2107-9187
Jacqueline StephensAboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jasmine MicklemRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Catalin TufanaruAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephen HarfieldAboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ike FisherInstitute of Urban Indigenous Health, Windsor, Queensland, Australia.
Odette PearsonAboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
James WardAboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarriers to receiving optimal healthcare exist for Indigenous populations globally for a range of reasons. To overcome such barriers and enable greater access to basic and specialist care, developments in information and communication technologies are being applied. The focus of this scoping review is on web-based therapeutic interventions (WBTI) that aim to provide guidance, support and treatment for health problems.

objectivesThis review identifies and describes international scientific evidence on WBTI used by Indigenous peoples in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and USA for managing and treating a broad range of health conditions. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies assessing WBTI designed for Indigenous peoples in Australia, Canada, USA and New Zealand, that were published in English, in peer-reviewed literature, from 2006 to 2018 (inclusive), were considered for inclusion in the review. Studies were considered if more than 50% of participants were Indigenous, or if results were reported separately for Indigenous participants. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Following a four-step search strategy in consultation with a research librarian, 12 databases were searched with a view to finding both published and unpublished studies. CHARTING

methodsData was extracted, synthesised and reported under four main conceptual categories: (1) types of WBTI used, (2) community uptake of WBTI, (3) factors that impact on uptake and (4) conclusions and recommendations for practice.

resultsA total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. The WBTI used were interactive websites, screening and assessment tools, management and monitoring tools, gamified avatar-based psychological therapy and decision support tools. Other sources reported the use of mobile apps, multimedia messaging or a mixture of intervention tools. Most sources reported moderate uptake and improved health outcomes for Indigenous people. Suggestions to improve uptake included as follows: tailoring content and presentation formats to be culturally relevant and appropriate, customisable and easy to use.

conclusionsCulturally appropriate, evidence-based WBTI have the potential to improve health, overcome treatment barriers and reduce inequalities for Indigenous communities. Access to WBTI, alongside appropriate training, allows health care workers to better support their Indigenous clients. Developing WBTI in partnership with Indigenous communities ensures that these interventions are accepted and promoted by the communities.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionPopulation GroupsAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCanadaHumansNew ZealandUnited StatesAboriginal and Torres Strait IslanderAppChronic diseaseDigital technologye-healthe-mental healthInfectious diseaseInformation TechnologyMental healthMobile healthTherapeutic intervention

Identifiers

PMID32475342
PMCPMC7262751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.